• PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    What does a “workplace democracy” mean?

    I’m envisioning that’s the janitor having a vote in where the brain surgeon makes the next cut.

    That’s a possible interpretation of “the people control the means of production”, but that’s just ridiculous.

    • NAXLAB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, that is a pretty ridiculous interpretation.

      Workplace democracy would most likely and most broadly refer to all employees of a company having a say in how the company is run. Either by voting on policies and changes, or by electing people to various executive/representative roles, much the same way that current Western democracies work.

      An example of the janitor voting on where the surgeon makes a cut makes about as much sense as us voting on where the president flies in his helicopter. At best, it doesn’t pass the make sense test, and at worst is a bad faith interpretation of what people mean when they say “workplace democracy”

      • Ashtear@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d settle for just having a labor representative in the C-suite at this point.

        • arthur@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          They will give you less than you ask, everytime. So better ask for much more.

    • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      hat’s a bad faith interpretation of “the people control the means of production”.

      I want you to consider the difference between the work needed to complete a task, and the work needed to manage a workplace: for one of those tasks, only the experts in that task can meaningfully contribute to the outcome, whereas for the other, everybody who is part of the workplace has meaningful input.

      I don’t know about your experience, but everywhere I’ve worked there have been people “on the ground” who get to see the inefficiencies in the logistics of their day to day jobs; in a good job a manager will listen and implement changes, but why should the workers be beholden to this middleman who doesn’t know how the job works?

      I’ve also had plenty of roles where management have been “telling me where to cut”.

    • Communist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s quite simple, right now businesses are structured in a totalitarian manner, socialism seeks to overthrow that totalitarian regime within your workplace, there’s a number of ways to do this, nobody is suggesting the janitor should decide how a surgeon does his job, we just want to eliminate the useless position of CEO, and replace it with democratic systems managed by the people who work the jobs.

      An easy to understand version of this would be if every company was transformed into a worker co-op, but that of course is only one of many models for socialism.

      It is important to note that the government is not the worker, and therefore government control over the means of production DOES NOT COUNT.

    • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It means the janitor has a vote on how their duties are done

      • PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        34
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So…what if they decide their duties are brain surgery?

        Like the nonsense a peer post to yours is spewing. From a person who’s handle is “communist”.

        They could have reasonable points, but if your philosophy suggests that brain surgeons can get told what to do by janitors, that’s a problem. I wouldn’t call that “totalitarian”. I would call that sane.

        Now, what do we do about brain surgeons and the cost of healthcare (which is and will always be phenomenal, no matter who is paying and how it is being paid for)?

        • Communist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Are you being outrageous and arguing in bad faith on purpose?

          I genuinely can’t tell, in the event that you’re not, nobody has ever suggested that janitors should be allowed to do the duties of brain surgeons. Furthermore, even if a single absolutely insane janitor decided he should be allowed to do the duties of a brain surgeon… nobody else would agree with them, because we live in a society with vaguely reasonable humans… and that janitor would likely be democratically FIRED for suggesting something so outrageous, or put in a mental institution.

          Or are you worried about the janitor uprising in which janitors decide they can do all jobs known to man? Perhaps nothing can stop the janitor uprising, and we are all doomed.

          • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            At the very least, they’d keep the streets clean! I, for one, welcome our janitorial overlords.

        • arthur@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Do you know any janitor that are willing to take the risk of killing someone and face the consequences of that? If so, I would recommend to keep your distance of that person.

        • apt_install_coffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          What kind of idiot workplace would allow that? Perhaps if you don’t assume the people you talk to are literally brain-dead, you might understand what they’re saying.

        • Aabbcc@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          what if they decide their duties are brain surgery?

          In your world the only thing keeping janitors from doing brain surgery is the current corporate structure?

          Like the nonsense a peer post to yours is spewing

          Which parts are nonsense

          but if your philosophy suggests that brain surgeons can get told what to do by janitors,

          It can’t.

          Now, what do we do about brain surgeons and the cost of healthcare

          The government pays for it like in most wealthy nations

          • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The first part reminds me of religious people who can’t fathom ethics existing outside of religion.

            “If there’s no hell what’s to stop people from doing bad things?”