• aksdb@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Having free WiFi might also be nice. But the physical copy is more versatile.

    • AngryAnusHornets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surprised they didn’t have free wifi, but at least they had a solution. Upside is less waste, faster menu updates, and not touching dirty menus… downside is convenience.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s exactly why I prefer qr. I don’t need to touch dirty menus and before anyone says that they clean them every night. Doesn’t matter, they use the same watery rag on all the menus, they may not be sticky but they sure as shit are still dirty. I’ve worked at plenty of restaurants, including ‘high end’ ones. The only way to guarantee they’re clean is to just print out a new one for each guest.

    • Lexica@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If the QR code was just encoded text or an image as apposed to a weblink, then this could have been avoided. Although, I’m not sure how many QR readers support images, and if your phone doesn’t have a built-in QR app nor you have a third-party one, then you’d be SOL anyways.

        • Lexica@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but that’d be the same as just having a physical menu in the first place. And that’s just far too logical for these quirky little restaraunts.

    • uberrice@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t get how people go abroad and don’t just get a local sim. In most countries, a travel sim is something between 20 and 40 bucks. In my opinion, that’s pretty essential.

        • uberrice@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Eh, guess so. I just never go for this extended layover kind of deal.

          And, because I’m European, I do not even need a different sim for the whole of Europe. Unlimited data.

          • TurtleTourParty@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            As a non European, prepaid sims in Europe are complicated. Some companies won’t sell sims to foreigners, some have little to no roaming. Some have activation fees that double the price.

            Some examples: in Germany you need to do a video call to activate your sim, in Italy most providers require you to have an Italian tax number to buy a sim. In Romanian most of the plans have a paltry 1 GB of roaming.

            Also most of the SIMs geared toward tourists don’t allow roaming.

          • dubyakay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m Canadian now but kept my Hungarian SIM, still paying it to this day after seven years. It’s 9EUR/mo for some paltry amount of data, but mostly just using it for online services that require a Hungarian or European phone number for MFA. I just bought extra data that counted as EU wide roaming data when I last visited.

            However the options for my wife were very limited as a non-EU traveller. I think it was €30 or something for ~5GB of data usable in Hungary only and limited to ten days (we stayed for 14) and added as an eSIM with the help of an app/website. It was not transferable to other EU member states, and this was one of the best deals we could find that did not require us to go to a physical store location. This included us checking offers for prepaid SIMs from the major providers (Vodafone / -Mobil / Yettel)