• cum@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Well it’s “allegedly” decentralized, which should solve this by design…

  • ulkesh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Anyone who still uses Twitter either condones what Musk has done and is doing, or is completely oblivious.

    I long for the day it dies the death it deserves and Musk is left holding the bag having to pay all the debt. If only he’d be forced to do that, but like all rich assholes, he’ll get out of it somehow.

  • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    7 hours ago

    changing how its “block” button works. That option previously allowed users to hide their profile from certain accounts – but will no longer do so.

    So I guess all that stuff they did to lock down the ability to see things on Xitter without an account was strictly for evil then

  • aramis87@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    9 hours ago

    “One of the biggest functions of blocking is giving women the ability to stop weird men from constantly making them uncomfortable and scared,” one user wrote. “So of course Elon had to change that.”

    Given how he constantly tries to insert himself and his opinions into everything he sees, it’s clear he has no idea about how consent works, nor why people don’t want him in their lives.

    • Butterbee (She/Her)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I honestly don’t think it’s a matter of him not understanding how consent works and more of a matter that he sees consent as something that gets in his way.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Or maybe just refuses to fathom that other people could not want to talk to him. If he has a psych file I’m sure it’s darkly fascinating.

    • mbirth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Rather people have no idea how blocking on 𝕏 worked/works. You were ALWAYS able to see tweets from people that blocked you by simply logging out or using an alt account.

      I don’t understand all this fuss about this simple change. He only removes a useless feature that was never more than a minor inconvenience for those that got blocked.

      If you don’t want people to see your tweets, lock your profile. This worked before and this still works just fine.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        8 hours ago

        You were ALWAYS able to see tweets from people that blocked you by simply logging out or using an alt account.

        Well, yeah. It’s a different account. That’s how accounts work. Do you think one account blocking someone should result in every account blocking them too?

        • mbirth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Having a public (i.e. not locked) Twit𝕏 account and believing you can block single people is a bit stupid to begin with.

          When screaming on a market square, you can’t demand for single people to “please not listen” to what you’re screaming.

          • Kichae@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Locking your front door won’t keep someone out who really wants to get in.

            Is that stupid, too?

            • mbirth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Of course, not. But closing and locking the door doesn’t prevent the person on the other side to still listen in on your conversations…

          • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Well, I don’t use Twitter. So that’s all you.
            But blocking accounts have been a thing for decades. It’s not a new concept.

            • mbirth@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              In closed systems like messengers, where you don’t see any content unless logged in, yes. There, it works brilliantly. But on Twitter, this is like cutting out something from a newspaper when there’s a news stand right next door.

                • mbirth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  And it’s exactly like this now, if I understand the change correctly. They only removed the “you can’t see this post because the owner limits who can see it” thing. Blocked people still can’t reply.

                • mbirth@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  Yep, that’s why I don’t get all this panicking about the Twitter change…

      • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        8 hours ago

        simply logging out or using an alt account

        It is increasingly difficult to use X without an account. Not sure what the signup process is like nowadays. IIRC it used to require phone number verification in the Twitter days, but perhaps Musk relaxed the requirements in order to better pad the usage stats with spambots?

  • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “One of the biggest functions of blocking is giving women the ability to stop weird men from constantly making them uncomfortable and scared,” one user wrote. “So of course Elon had to change that.”

    They buried the lede a bit there, but that’s pretty much it.

    • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Does Mastodon have the blocking features that Bluesky has (like lists, blocks stopping quote reply chains, etc)?

      Other than on Blahaj, I’ve never found a place more chill to be queer online once you apply a couple of well maintained block lists.

      • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        If you need the feature set of Bluesky and can’t use Mastodon, please also follow https://fed.brid.gy/ if you can. This will allow Mastodon users to follow you from the Fediverse.

      • Fitik@fedia.io
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        As far as I’m aware, Mastodon blocks work the same way they’ll work on Twitter now - The person you blocked can see your posts, but can’t interact with you

        Edit: Actually, I was wrong the person you blocked can’t see your posts on Mastodon

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah it really actually only takes a couple of big users moving to Mastodon to cause a domino effect of a mass migration. I hope more people with tons of followers start moving over.

        • thejml@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The problem is that people won’t move until their audience there and their audience won’t move until they are there.

          And mastodon is a bit less straightforward compared to old Twitter.

          • Kichae@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Mastodon is also somewhat hostile towards new users. Significant swaths of it treat this shared public network as a small private chatroom, and get cranky when September stretches on too long.

            • KNova@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Of course this is anecdotal but I haven’t seen that - most of the disdain I’ve seen is towards new instance admins who don’t take proper steps to moderate stuff or prevent spammy signups.

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Yeah, but some people are more willing to move onto a smaller platform. Like us. In practice, as long as more than one person becomes willing per person who makes the change, it works out to compounding percentage growth, which is good because the internet itself would never have taken off otherwise (or cities and railways, for that matter).

    • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      If they don’t, please also follow https://fed.brid.gy/ so your BlueSky account is federated to Mastodon. If you move to Threads, please turn on Fediverse integration.

      It’s so frustrating, between Mastodon, Bluesky and Threads almost every person I used to follow on Twitter exists somewhere else. But only about half of them are accessible in any one platform.

    • troed@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      IOCX has a noticeable increase in new user signups since a day or two back.

  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 hours ago

    who knew that removing the block feature and “Twitter’s new ToS says all disputes will be heard in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas located in Tarrant County (Tesla investor Reed O’Connor’s court)” were not going to be winners among the remaining userbase