• rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think I’ve landed on Flatpak as my favourite between Snap, Flatpak, and AppImage. AppImage, when it works, is nice though. Snaps are just kind of inconvenient (auto-updates are a no for me) and bloated and the things Canonical are doing as an organization put a bad taste in my mouth.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      16 minutes ago

      I’ve had bad experiences with AppImages. For universal format they do a really poor job at that. And it’s a huge step back into Windows direction that you’ll have to manually download, update etc your shit. Makes managing a bunch of apps a pain.

  • NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Unpopular opinion: snap is not so bad and genuinely useful for many things

    I would rather have a snap than building from source or use some tar.gz archive with a sketchy install script

    • m4m4m4m4@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      31 minutes ago

      some tar.gz archive with a sketchy install script

      I just can’t… like maybe I’m too old and that’s why I still can’t wrap my head around how we went from “./configure && make & make install scripts are almost the de facto way to install software in linux” to “a sketchy install script”. We’re living interesting times at Linux

      • RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        34 minutes ago

        Last time I ran a corporate-made installer, it caused massive graphical glitches and lock-ups after waking from sleep. It basically gave my system computer-AIDS.

        That’s why I never run scripts which are too long for me to easily understand outside a sandbox. Official distro repositories and Flatpaks are the only sources I have some level of trust in.

    • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      39 minutes ago

      I’d rather be able to use my web browser uninterrupted without it being updated while using it and be forced to restart it.

      • lengau@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 minutes ago

        The updates download in the background and will install when you exit the snapped app. If you really don’t want automatic updates, you can run snap refresh --hold to hold all automatic updates or add a snap name to hold updates for that snap.

        • lengau@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 minutes ago

          A built-in way to have services running (which is why openprinting can make a snap of CUPS but AFAICT can’t make a Flatpak).