The class action will be decided by a single judge and could be a ‘genuine problem for Monsanto and Bayer if we’re successful’, lawyer says
Science is not decided in a courtroom.
Sort of? The science is settled by scientists, the courtrooms interpret the science for social purposes, though.
Scientifically everything probably has an impact on cancer risk. There’s still a huge difference between radioisotopes and table salt for social purposes.
Nobody doubt’s that it causes birth defects in farm workers.
Is that not enough reason to ban it?
Downvoted come from selfish folks that only care about theirimmediate families and not the wellbeing of the workers who pick the food they eat
Lucky for me, I’ve already been born
Maybe not. How much less are you willing to eat? Better PPE usage would be the first thing I’d look into if what you’re saying is true.
fun little nugget of wisdom I uncovered reading about this, the Wikipedia page on Glyphosphate cites this metareview, the only metareview it cites finding that glyphosphate is not carcinogenic.
Fucking LOL. A career doubt-caster.
Is anybody a Wikipedia editor? This could probably use a pointer to the connection, at least.
The class action will be decided by a single judge
So the entire balance of this case will rest on whether this single judge can be bribed or not?
Seems like an awful way to rule on such an important lawsuit.
Frankly, it’s a great way to rule on such an important lawsuit if you’re the one with the most bribe money. That’s why the system is so great, for people with the most bribe money.
FYI: This as about people who work with large amounts of it. If you’re a normal person who washes their veggies you’re still safe.
