@Joe_0237@fosstodon.org wrote:

Today I found out that google docs infects html exports with spyware, no scripts, but links in your document are replaced with invisible google tracking redirects. I was using their software because a friend wanted me to work with him on a google doc, he is a pretty big fan of their software, but we were both somehow absolutely shocked that they would go that far.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not that shocking. Spyware companies have been doing this stuff since the 90’s, and Google is basically just a really rich spyware company now.

  • guckfoogle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Literally went from being my favorite company to just an unethical bag of poo for me. Hope whoever’s forcing these engineers to create privacy invading spyware eats a bag of dicks.

  • _cnt0@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’ve been doing the same with all hyperlinks in the gmail web frontend. Not when you fetch the mails via imap/pop, though.

  • library_napper@monyet.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Google would argue that this is a security feature.

    Many business intentionally do this in google hosted email. It allows google to display warmings about links to malicious websites

  • p_consti@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s the same thing in emails, if you use the web application. All links are redirect links over their servers.

  • Sha'ul@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    How are people surprised? How is this news?

    The second you mentioned Google you’re talking about an all-seeing totalitarian state. Nothing you said about imbedding tracking links in docs is surprised. As a corporation they are always developing new ways to pimp you out and make you turn tricks for Google without you knowing while they keep all of the pay from your actiities.

    Google tries to turn every human on the planent into their personal money making whore.

    • insomniac@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course it’s not at all surprising but it’s still particularly egregious and should be called out.

    • ubermeisters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      you absolute fucking nincompoop! You’ve never fully fleshed out every single possible vector that Google could use to track and catalog you? Moron!!

      -You, just now

  • mspencer712@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are there any beneficial side effects? If they discover a URL is malicious after it’s been exported, would this allow them to intercept the click and stop someone from reaching the malicious site?

    • d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s how Microsoft markets their “safe links” in Outlook, which is more or less the same behavior of wrapping all links with a redirect. Whether they actually do anything with that to save you from phishing attempts or whatever… who knows. Even if there is a safety feature, it’s still an easy way to mine url query params for data or learn about the user for other purposes (which they may or may not be doing)

      IMO if you can’t turn it off, there’s a secondary motive to the feature. Especially when the feature is marketed from a place of fear rather than aid.

      • foksmash@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The MS security feature does work quite well (at least for Enterprise).

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not sure I would categorize it as working “quite well”. At least not in my experience. It’s better than nothing.

          • foksmash@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ya, I would tend to agree and left out the context. It’s not our only URL filtering tool, we have a full proxy and URL rewrite in email for that but it does help fill in gaps when people click links from devices we don’t manage.

    • tavu@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hi! I’m over here on lemmy, and created this post as a link to your post. I don’t think there’s a mutually compatible way to repost/boost a mastodon post into a lemmy community, but this seemed close enough.