• atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ahhh, post modern “there is no truth”.

    Just because CNN has flaws doesn’t mean it’s not a better source of information than “louder with crowder”.

    Organizations that have standards and make reasonable attempts to be accurate should be promoted over “Dave’s rage blog”.

    • vettnerk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      As much as I despise CNN and NYtimes, I have to agree that they’re miles better than many of their peers, and while flawed they’re usually factually on point. I just wish they weren’t as easily swayed by owners and institutions who have vested interest in which stories are run, and which aren’t.

      • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People have to realize there is not such thing as perfect. And agreeing with you is not “better”. The echo-chamber is a bad thing, not a good thing.

        Sources of information that have an intention of integrity and who strive to follow it are better sources than rampant unbridled partisanship and yellow-journalism. Even FoxNews (the news side not the trash side) is a better source than some liberal blog that makes no attempt to be objective at all.