

TY for mentioning/explaining scoping.


TY for mentioning/explaining scoping.
Also the profession from the comic is a ‘lamplighter’, not ‘gaslighter’.
Gaslighting used to be a more colorful, sinister description of the act of manipulation.
I still maintain that this is the only correct use of the term.


It’s evolution rather than revolution. Which is fine, not everything can be revolutionary.


Seems obvious
Conversely, not having money also sucks and should be considered


No one wants to deal with politically motivated internet trolls, sorry. If you aren’t one of those then be mad that the trolls ruined it for you.


It comes off like this: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions


Officers swear to uphold the constitution. Enlisted swear to follow orders


What about directories under XYZ?
Wow works fine on Linux for me


Maybe he should write an article instead of a video. I’m much more likely to engage with those. Or I guess I could run his video through an LLM to get a text summary.


Yes, that’s attempted murder. The method doesn’t matter, just the intent. A lawyer would likely argue that you can’t prove intent in this case, but in your hypothetical we know the intent.


Making a small phone is harder than making a big phone.


The immediate impact is that the mineral rights treaty wasn’t signed. Past that the impact remains to be seen.


Fuck whoever you want, makes no difference to me


And what backs up law other than implied threat of force?
Because there are a lot of people with different goals that conflict with each other? Which is true in lots and lots of other things.