

The most damning part of this whole affair, even if it’s not entirely “new,” is just how many elected officials claimed they didn’t know X, Y, and Z were in the bill before they voted for it. How could they be qualified to represent their constituents if they’re not even doing the bare minimum of reading the things they’re voting for? That should immediately disqualify them from holding office.









Some countries stipulate that it is illegal to publish someone’s photograph without their consent. Sometimes there is a distinction between personal and commercial use, but usually commercial use is the more strict, and Google’s use would definitely count as commercial.
I found a site which seems to have the corresponding law for Argentina: https://www.argentina.gob.ar/justicia/derechofacil/leysimple/propiedad-intelectual
DeepL translation below: