

The photos were in the ‘trash can’ according to the article. Most people would wipe their phone with a kleenex tissue.
The photos were in the ‘trash can’ according to the article. Most people would wipe their phone with a kleenex tissue.
Which country will be America’s trash can?
Only by not doing them, both the one world government and the language.
A company can’t be open source, software can.
Of that software requires significant infrastructure provided by a company you can’t rely on the overall service. If not you self host or find community implementations.
There are plenty of untrustworthy Europeans as well, we should not uncritically switch to a European company.
We have commonly contact with law enforcement when it comes to CSAM, CP or any life threats against a user.
And they ask you to run your investigations? Because your TOS says ‘any investigations by either us or by law enforcement authorities’
If you dont want anything to do with lemmy.world, please dont interact with us, you can block our instance on newer lemmy instances in your settings. We can remove your content through a ban + content removal if you want it.
You do not need my consent or any justification to ban me or delete my posts. You can still do that even if I 've never agreed to your TOS, I am not entitled to post on your instance.
It’s the fancy legalese claims of me waiving any claims against your that won’t hold up.
We included this in our TOS to protect our services, volunteers and its users.
My honest if not friendly advice to protect your services would be to never ever investigate yourself instead of law enforcement as your TOS imply you might. You should also make clear that federated users are not accessing your infrastructure, because you cannot provide any access information to authorities should such a user post illegal content in your instance remotely.
Does this include stuff like me waiving any claims against you for any action taken in a investigation by you or law enforcement?
In fact care to explain what sort of actions and investigation lemmy.world envisions performing on users?
yes your instance of your user is subject to our TOS.
I can’t make sense of that sentence, I assume you mean users regardless of instance are subject to your TOS if they post in communities in lemmy.world
Which I find bizarre because I am not your user, I have not agreed to your TOS and I am not using your site, API etc deffined
To be clear I am not talking about bans or post deletions, you don’t need a TOS or my consent to prevent me posting in your server.
Rather about stuff section 4.2 and the Our Rights sections where users waive you from any claims, the pseudo-legal stuff. By the same logic a user would be subject to any TOS from any instance to whose communities they happen to post at.Obviously Lemmy can’t work that way.
They most certainly have this covered in ToS. IP law is not about actual creators’ rights.
Not sure since I don’t use a VPN. If they assigned a unique public IP per user they could just forward every incoming connection to the user’s PC.
If they don’t they need to setup some port forwarding rules.
If openVPN leaks IPs that’s surely a bug, if it’s specific to v6 you can’t use openVPN and IPv6 till the bug is fixed
Port forwarding is necessary due to NAT not firewalls.
It’s not that your router blocks new incoming connections at port X, it’s that it does not know which local client it’s meant for, since it’s addressed to the public IP that is held by your router.
With IP6 it’s lan client also gets assigned a public IP6 address (as there are plenty) and so the router receives a connection addressed to a Lan client and knows where to route it.
Not saying that’s not a great idea, but just think of what it would entail - for starters, who would be the commander in chief of a European army?
Not a foreign adversary, probably France
The EU needs to remove all us military from it’s territory, replicate any NATO structures as EU ones and even make sure there are no people in our armies with confused loyalties. This needed to happen before Trump even became a candidate for 2016.
I 've seen it. You want to rename the axes. The US Democrats are socially progressive right wingers, Zapatero is socially progressive left winger.
I am also not denying that there different dimensions of politics ideologies and that people can hold different combinations of them.
But neoliberalism is a position in the left-right axis. On the right. If you describe someone as a neoliberal you are describing a right winger. They might be socially progressive or they might not be. I also expect that whatever else they are they will primarily act based on their neoliberal convictions. Just like I expect the US Democrats (at least the high profile officials and politicians) to put neo liberalism before social progress.
Even in those systems the positions on capitalism are on the horizontal, left to right axis. Because when talking about politics left and right are used to describe positions on capitalism.
Neoliberalism is a pro capitalism ideology therefore it’s a right wing ideology.
That people may not hold political ideologies is irrelevant to neoliberalism being a right Wong ideology. Its also not a new phenomenon by any means.
What is there to reconcile?
They are not part of the left. They are more moderate than neoliberals since they do (in theory) believe that capitalism must be at least somewhat regulated unlike neo liberals.
Neoliberalism is a pro capitalism, free markets and deregulation ideology. That makes it inherently right wing.
Do you have to be an ancap to be considered right wing in your viewpoint?
Neoliberalism is a right wing ideology, not center-left.
Its an action game with RPG like stst systems.
Even if all the ice melts (when there are going to be real problems) Russia doesn’t have anywhere near the capacity to launch an amphibious attack against Canada.
Taking into account how their invasion of Ukraine, with massive land borders, was botched, there is no chance they ll succeed.
So non RPGs are better RPGs? You don’t have to like RPGs.
Benjamin Franklin, delusionally Anglo supremacist and US
Godfounding father