• 1 Post
  • 257 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 15th, 2023

help-circle





  • We have commonly contact with law enforcement when it comes to CSAM, CP or any life threats against a user.

    And they ask you to run your investigations? Because your TOS says ‘any investigations by either us or by law enforcement authorities’

    If you dont want anything to do with lemmy.world, please dont interact with us, you can block our instance on newer lemmy instances in your settings. We can remove your content through a ban + content removal if you want it.

    You do not need my consent or any justification to ban me or delete my posts. You can still do that even if I 've never agreed to your TOS, I am not entitled to post on your instance.

    It’s the fancy legalese claims of me waiving any claims against your that won’t hold up.

    We included this in our TOS to protect our services, volunteers and its users.

    My honest if not friendly advice to protect your services would be to never ever investigate yourself instead of law enforcement as your TOS imply you might. You should also make clear that federated users are not accessing your infrastructure, because you cannot provide any access information to authorities should such a user post illegal content in your instance remotely.



  • yes your instance of your user is subject to our TOS.

    I can’t make sense of that sentence, I assume you mean users regardless of instance are subject to your TOS if they post in communities in lemmy.world

    Which I find bizarre because I am not your user, I have not agreed to your TOS and I am not using your site, API etc deffined

    To be clear I am not talking about bans or post deletions, you don’t need a TOS or my consent to prevent me posting in your server.

    Rather about stuff section 4.2 and the Our Rights sections where users waive you from any claims, the pseudo-legal stuff. By the same logic a user would be subject to any TOS from any instance to whose communities they happen to post at.Obviously Lemmy can’t work that way.






  • Not saying that’s not a great idea, but just think of what it would entail - for starters, who would be the commander in chief of a European army?

    Not a foreign adversary, probably France

    The EU needs to remove all us military from it’s territory, replicate any NATO structures as EU ones and even make sure there are no people in our armies with confused loyalties. This needed to happen before Trump even became a candidate for 2016.


  • azuth@sh.itjust.workstoEurope@feddit.orgAbout politico.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    I 've seen it. You want to rename the axes. The US Democrats are socially progressive right wingers, Zapatero is socially progressive left winger.

    I am also not denying that there different dimensions of politics ideologies and that people can hold different combinations of them.

    But neoliberalism is a position in the left-right axis. On the right. If you describe someone as a neoliberal you are describing a right winger. They might be socially progressive or they might not be. I also expect that whatever else they are they will primarily act based on their neoliberal convictions. Just like I expect the US Democrats (at least the high profile officials and politicians) to put neo liberalism before social progress.


  • azuth@sh.itjust.workstoEurope@feddit.orgAbout politico.eu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    Even in those systems the positions on capitalism are on the horizontal, left to right axis. Because when talking about politics left and right are used to describe positions on capitalism.

    Neoliberalism is a pro capitalism ideology therefore it’s a right wing ideology.

    That people may not hold political ideologies is irrelevant to neoliberalism being a right Wong ideology. Its also not a new phenomenon by any means.