• 0 Posts
  • 202 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 1st, 2023

help-circle


  • I had so many good times on forums back in the day.

    The personal nature of them was great for being social and making friends, but it was also good for the quality of the content for and user behaviour too.

    When everyone recognises you and remembers your past behaviour, people put effort into creating a good reputation for themselves and making quality posts. It’s like living in a small village versus living in a city.

    The thought of being banned back then genuinely filled people with dread, because even if you could evade it (which many people couldn’t as VPNs were barely a thing) you’d lose your whole post history and personal connection with people, and users did cherish those things.





  • Not quite, I don’t think. Enshittification is driven by profit motive, which means if there’s no money at all involved, then there’s no motive.

    I guess you chose your words carefully though because the terms ‘product’ and ‘service’ pretty much imply that money is involved somewhere there.






  • I have a portable monitor that I’m pretty pleased with.

    It has a magnetic cover that goes over the screen to keep it safe, and that same cover folds and goes on the back to act as a stand when it’s in use. Power and video are via the same USB-C cable.

    Nice and slim and stays in my bag most of the time but when I want a second screen I can whip it out in two secs.

    A screen that attaches to the laptop sounds convenient initially, but I feel like in practice it would be a hindrance and make your laptop clunky and bulky.








  • tiramichu@lemm.eetoBooks@lemmy.ml*Permanently Deleted*
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I can easily see both sides on this one.

    In one way I have little sympathy. It’s the same as parents complaining after they show their child a violent anime, that it was a ‘cartoon’ and so it must be for children - having made that snap judgement without investigating the contents in the slightest.

    On the other hand, as the article rightly suggests, there are established conventions in the publishing industry and this book defied them.

    They are conventions I personally kinda hate, because they are the reason every Crime paperback looks the same as each other, and every Sci-Fi book is instantly recognisable as that genre on the shelves. But the conventions do exist.

    In mass-market publishing terms, sparkly happy cartoon = children.

    The publisher and author totally knew what they were doing here and they did it anyway. It’s wilfully misleading.

    Whether established standards should be enough to absolve a parent of the responsibility to understand what they are giving to their child, though, you decide.