• @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    -710 months ago

    Except that’s not actually how it worked. We didn’t always have solid scientific models before things happened. Bicycles are the more famous example of something that existed for years before science could explain why it works, it’s still not perfectly explained. Flight is also somewhat week in the scientific model for lift, but we can still make planes.

    While there have been instances where scientists have theorized/discovered X is possible and then a way to do X was built, it’s not required.

    • zea
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      Hypothesis: adding this part or doing that thing will make it do what I want.

      Experiment: do that change and see if it does the thing you want.

      If it doesn’t do what you want, go back to hypothesis step. If that’s not science, idk what is.

      • @ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        -310 months ago

        You don’t know what is. Science isn’t do something and see if it works, it’s about explaining why something works. Scientific experiments only disprove a hypothesis or can’t disprove. Eventually a collection of results can be evidence of proof, but it’s not actually proof.

        You’re more in engineering of wanting to do a thing and finding a way to accomplish that thing based on the current understanding of the relative science.

        • zea
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          I literally just described the scientific method. Sure, it’s not the kind of question most scientists would ask, but it’s the same scientific method.