EU Article 45 requires that browsers trust certificate authorities appointed by governments::The EU is poised to pass a sweeping new regulation, eIDAS 2.0. Buried deep in the text is Article 45, which returns us to the dark ages of 2011, when certificate authorities (CAs) could collaborate with governments to spy on encrypted traffic—and get away with it. Article 45 forbids browsers from…

  • MeanEYE
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -18 months ago

    Am thinking this looks like a nightmare but their intentions are actually different. However giving any kind of power to government is almost universally bad idea since it’s guaranteed to be abused, no matter the initial reason it was added.

      • MeanEYE
        link
        fedilink
        English
        28 months ago

        I can actually think of more reasons that it’s a legitimate request than a shady one.

          • MeanEYE
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 months ago

            Well, like I wrote in other comment of mine. Governments here issue personal certificates signed by government ones. These personal certificates can then be used to digitally sign documents and tax reports. It can be used to log into government web sites and many similar uses. These certificates that EU says browsers have to accept are the same ones everyone already uses for biometric passports. If browser accepted these root certificates, then things would be significantly easier to support. No software installation required.

            People seem to think this will be used for nefarious cases, but in reality people just install government issued software without thinking. Well, any software without thinking. During that installation you can already add certificate to browser and whole OS. It’s just easier and better supported if they go through public way instead of having to support multiple OS installations and similar issues.

            • @ShunkW@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              Yeah that argument holds zero water. Forcing browsers to trust these roots means not only pre-trusting them, but disallowing removal of trust. This is completely intended for surveillance purposes.

              • MeanEYE
                link
                fedilink
                English
                08 months ago

                Removal of trust happened many times in the past. And like I said, it’s not changing anything other than making things easier. You can still add certificates to the browser trusted list if you have access to the person’s computer, which when you install any software you do. Perhaps the best middle ground would be to add certificates but make them conditional that is to say ask the user what they want to do and offer multiple options. Trust for this domain only, trust always, just this time, don’t trust.

                • @ShunkW@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  The current text of Article 45 requires that browsers trust CAs appointed by governments

                  Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article. You can keep shilling for government surveillance if you want, but I’m done listening.

                  • MeanEYE
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    08 months ago

                    Am not shilling, am merely pointing out there are easier ways to spy on people without putting it through legal channels.