• kirklennon
    link
    fedilink
    158 months ago

    The whole argument is ridiculous because it’s only the messages that you wrote and sent that are even on a blue or green color. The messages you read are always on the same light gray background regardless of how they sent.

      • kirklennon
        link
        fedilink
        -18 months ago

        It’s just an incredibly weak argument. Messages that you, yourself, wrote are in slightly lower contrast? Who cares? For users who actually have vision problems with low-contrast, there’s a single Reduce Transparency toggle in Accessibility settings that will resolve this issue and a bunch of other ones.

        • @aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          118 months ago

          An incredibly weak argument is saying that it’s fine for Apple to intentionally make their UX worse, because they didn’t make it worse enough to matter.

          • kirklennon
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            They picked a tint of a color used on low priority text. Someone argued that this particular tint is slightly worse for certain people. If you don’t have vision problems, it’s not really worse for you at all. We’re talking about small differences in relative contrast between different elements. If you do have vision problems, you can easily make it and other similar situations across the entire platform easier to read with an accessibility toggle.

            No, I don’t buy the argument that the UX for reading SMS messages is meaningfully worse than for iMessages.

          • kirklennon
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            People care that SMS and MMS suck. “Green messages” is just a shorthand, nontechnical way of describing it. Nobody legitimately cares that the green background is every-so-slightly lower contrast than the blue background.