• @lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    517 months ago

    Nooooo anything but more environmentally friendly vehicles that people can actually afford. Won’t somebody think of the profits?

    • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      207 months ago

      not sure about environmentally friendly,friendlier sure, but a well developed public transit system and biking infrastructure beats any kind of car based infrastructure

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Complements. The reason we’re stuck in this auto-dystopia (are we auto-asphyxiating? ;-) is people wanting one size fits all infrastructure. Let’s apply this more intelligently this time - recognize that some areas are more built up than others and different solutions scale differently . In general that can be a good thing, but we need interconnected services for everyone. That does include cars in many areas, although I agree a worthwhile goal for cities/town centers is that people not need a car

      • @const_void@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        Don’t forget working from home. Proven by the lockdown air quality to be the most environmentally friendly option. Remember this when you’re employer is asking you to “return to the office”.

      • @dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 months ago

        We need the incrementally more eco-friendly options as well. Most pickup truck driving office workers won’t suddenly get a bike and change their ways, so a more eco friendly personal vehicle is probably a lot more likely to reduce emissions for that demography.

    • @SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Won’t somebody think of the profits?

      This article is literally about people doing this