• @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 year ago

    We don’t need to praise the software specifically because it’s Open Source. We need good Open source Software of which there are plenty of great examples.

    Blender, Krita, Libre Office, Audacity. These are great. Better than the paid competitors in a lot for ways.

    Gimp and scribus are simply not. That should mean we start developing good FOSS software to fill that gap, as a collective.

    • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      Tenacity, not audacity. Audacity got took over by a company with questionable record and tried to add telemetry into it. Tenacity was the OS fork which stayed true to principles.

      GIMP may not be your bag, but it’s highly used and many find it has much higher quality features than the alternatives. UI may not be popular, but it doesn’t prevent it being a solid bit of open source software.

      Btw, what steps have you taken to improve open source graphics software? It’s easy to bash, it’s harder to learn and contribute.

      Open source contributors > open source advocates > grateful open source users > almost everyone else > open source critics

      • GizmoLion
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        One doesn’t need to be a dev to have opinions about ease of use of a piece of software, don’t be dense.

        • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          511 months ago

          That is true, but to get free software made by people in their free time and say “this is rubbish” is a little ungrateful.

          “Here, have this free food…”. " ewww gross, that is so bad".

          • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I’m saying is that there is tons of open source software that isn’t crap. Gimp has no excuse it should be as good as the others.

            Especially one as mature as Gimp.

            • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              111 months ago

              Considering I know many artists that use it as first choice, I know you’re wrong.

              It’s good software, you just don’t like it.

              • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                211 months ago

                Well, I guess your anecdotal evidence is as good as mine, because nobody in my design circle will touch the damn thing. Meanwhile Blender is the standard for 3d designers I know.

                • @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 months ago

                  Blender is for models, not art. It’s different software. It’s great at what it does. Expecting that because one open source project can beat proprietary then all can is a pretty shallow view. A project relies on volunteers, sacrifice and funding.

                  You’re saying it’s bad because no one you know uses it doesn’t suggest no-one uses it, just you don’t know the users of it. Maybe your circle is as open minded to software as you are. Similar people surround themselves with each other. It says more about you than the software.

                  • @PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one
                    link
                    fedilink
                    311 months ago

                    Buddy, I breath open source.

                    Linux on every rig, third parry clients for every service. K9 mail, graphene OS, Linux.

                    Every damn app and program outside of my banking is open source. I love open source. Gimp just simply sucks ass. Its why Gimp offends me so much. Its the one weak spot in my entire open source life.

                  • GizmoLion
                    link
                    fedilink
                    211 months ago

                    You can die on this hill if you want to. Gimp has its reputation amongst the public, and it’s not for it’s user friendly UI. Maybe you like the jank, but that doesn’t mean it’s optimal.

                    Also, another thing open source projects need is feedback from the public. The UI being horrid is feedback, and just because you feel the need to white knight and feel personally offended by this feedback doesnt make the feedback invalid. You can complain about the phrasing used, but if you use that as reason to disregard the feedback or get defensive and accusatory towards the person (the “what have YOU done” bit was particularly irrelevant) then you’re part of the problem regardless how much you feel you’re the solution.