@Weirdbeardgame@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoWhat's not a sign someone's an asshole, but is often misinterpreted as one?message-square185fedilinkarrow-up1165arrow-down19
arrow-up1156arrow-down1message-squareWhat's not a sign someone's an asshole, but is often misinterpreted as one?@Weirdbeardgame@lemmy.ml to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square185fedilink
minus-squarethemeatbridgelinkfedilink65•1 year agoParking in a handicapped parking spot and having no visible disability.
minus-squareChaotic Entropylinkfedilink3•1 year agoWhat about parking diagonally across two or three disabled parking spots?
minus-square@CallumWells@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoIn general if you’re parking across 2+ parking spots you’re an asshole, no matter if the parking spots are disabled or not. There are exceptions, but one would have to be considerate in how one parks for those to be legitimate (IMHO).
minus-square@Viking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•1 year agoThat’s being an asshole who might be addicted to tic tac toe.
minus-square@CoderKat@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 year agoIt’s bizarre to me how many people assume that disabilities must be visible. And not just visible, but that it has to be glaringly visible. You’d think that it’d be well known that visibilities might not be obvious, but nope.
Parking in a handicapped parking spot and having no visible disability.
What about parking diagonally across two or three disabled parking spots?
In general if you’re parking across 2+ parking spots you’re an asshole, no matter if the parking spots are disabled or not. There are exceptions, but one would have to be considerate in how one parks for those to be legitimate (IMHO).
That’s being an asshole who might be addicted to tic tac toe.
It’s bizarre to me how many people assume that disabilities must be visible. And not just visible, but that it has to be glaringly visible.
You’d think that it’d be well known that visibilities might not be obvious, but nope.