• Ispanicus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 months ago

    If any legislation was to happen, it would be to mandate the standard work week to 32 hours, so if a company wanted to have you for 40 they would have to pay overtime. This has happened several times in history already by the way (6 to 5 day work week and 12 to 8 hour work day), so I don’t see how it would be any different.

    Companies don’t pay out of the goodness of their hearts, they pay what the market demands, so if they cannot get new hires at a certain salary, they will have to increase it.

    • @lynny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      Why would my company pay me overtime rather than telling me to go home after 32 hours? My wage will be cut, the only benefit I get is a better work life balance, but that doesn’t mean much when I’ll no longer be able to afford rent.

      I remember people telling us here in the rust belt that bills like NAFTA would benefit us greatly by reducing the cost of living, yet 30 years later we’re still suffering and being told to trust the same pencil pushers who promised not to screw us over last time.

      Thankfully I don’t see republicans letting this bill though. We’ve suffered enough of this economic experimentation.

      • @younity@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        The same reason you said a 32 hour work week is impossible, “because manufacturing”

        Why does overtime exist already? The question you are asking on the face is so asinine it barely merits a response.

        • @lynny@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          111 months ago

          I never said anything was impossible, I said it will be a logistical nightmare that will hurt working class people at the expense of office workers. I’m done engaging if you’re going to intentionally take my comments out of context. Good day.