• @TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          2211 months ago

          Yes but no one here said they wanted to guarantee an advantage to Republicans, unless that is what you are saying?

            • Dr. Bluefall
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2011 months ago

              First Past The Post voting means that if you have one right-wing candidate get 40% of the vote, and three left-wing candidates get 20% each, the right-winger wins.

              It’s not the system we want, but it’s the system we’ve got, and until we have the power to change that, it’s the rules we’ll have to work with.

              • @zer0@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                -911 months ago

                Enough of this bullshit, any party has the same chances of winning the vote don’t trust the propaganda

                • Guy Dudeman
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  Except that in reality, the party with the most money and familiarity and that aligns most closely with the majority of VOTING people tends to win in American elections. We only have two parties. Whether you like that or not, that’s the reality. Everyone on the left who votes for a third party is literally throwing their vote away.

                  Until we have Ranked Choice voting from the local level to the executive level, we will never have more than two parties.

                  And since we only have two parties, those parties agree on 1 thing: Never let Ranked Choice Voting happen.

            • @Mefek@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              1411 months ago

              You split the vote. If you would have voted for one of the parties but you instead vote for a third party, third parties are not going to win in this day and age and your vote can no longer support whichever of the two parties you prefer. If enough members of one party does that (because they have simmilar views), the party that doesn’t have some of their voters voting for a third party gains an advantage. It’s kinda dumb but it’s also why it was inevitable that this voting system would become 2 party.

              • @dirtbiker509@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                611 months ago

                We need Ranked Choice Voting for presidency ASAP. I am super happy to see that it’s making it’s way into some states lower votes. But to be honest out of all the things I vote on, the most important one feels like the President and that’s the one I want RCV for.

              • @zer0@thelemmy.club
                link
                fedilink
                -811 months ago

                As long as people like you keep drinking the propaganda made by the two parties system that no third party can win, then no third party will ever win

                • @Mefek@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  111 months ago

                  Fucking hell, do you really expect for one of the third parties to actually get 50% of total voters? Third parties have occasionally done alright in recent years but alright for a third party isn’t even close to winning, if they won a state it would be a HUGE deal. The current system pushes against third parties because the risk isn’t worth potentially splitting the votes to most voters. There has to be an actual change to how we vote to make voting for third parties viable.

                  • @zer0@thelemmy.club
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -111 months ago

                    Bullshit, any third party has the same changes of winning the propaganda makes you believe only red and blue can win