suspicious_eye@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-29 months agoDid you ever think that maybe all VPN services are actually secretly owned/funded by governments and that they are only giving you a false illusion of privacy?message-squaremessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1302arrow-down139
arrow-up1263arrow-down1message-squareDid you ever think that maybe all VPN services are actually secretly owned/funded by governments and that they are only giving you a false illusion of privacy?suspicious_eye@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world · edit-29 months agomessage-square127fedilink
minus-squareParagone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·9 months agoIn correct law, that’d be copyright-violation committed by your ISP: IF the website you hit didn’t authorize your ISP to create a derivative-work, THEN your ISP adulterating it should be considered commercial-copyright-violation, and stomped by the copyright-lobby. Notice how this has been going-on for decades, and the copyright-lobby … ignores it, to stomp-on individuals only… Interesting evidence of “rule of ‘law’”, isn’t it?
In correct law, that’d be copyright-violation committed by your ISP:
IF the website you hit didn’t authorize your ISP to create a derivative-work,
THEN your ISP adulterating it should be considered commercial-copyright-violation, and stomped by the copyright-lobby.
Notice how this has been going-on for decades, and the copyright-lobby … ignores it, to stomp-on individuals only…
Interesting evidence of “rule of ‘law’”, isn’t it?