• TrontheTechie@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    205
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I don’t fuck guys who “don’t pay attention to politics”.

    That means one thing, and it isn’t that they are blissfully unaware of the day to day happenings in their town, county, state, region, country, or planet of residence.

    • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Eh, sometimes it means another thing, namely that they know their conservatism is off-putting to most women and they’re lying to get you into bed.

        • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was responding to the previous comment, not OP. OP was saying conservatives get upset when people won’t sleep with them because they’re conservative. From the text of the comment I responded to, it looks like the person is saying “moderates” just don’t care about anyone but themselves. I’m adding that often the people the actual OP is talking about pretend to be the moderates the previous commenter is discussing.

          • Lilli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            The person you responded to initially is talking about conservatives hiding that about themselves lol. That’s why they said it the way they did.

    • medgremlin@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It depends on why they don’t pay attention to politics. Personally, I kind of have to go ostrich-mode and bury my head in the sand when school gets stressful because I just don’t have the mental bandwidth to deal with both. I’m not going to judge someone too harshly for protecting their mental health from the absolute shitshow that is the American political landscape.

      PS: This is not to say that any degree of modern conservatism is okay. Bigots can go fuck themselves and I’d be out punching Nazis and being a medic at protests if it didn’t jeopardize my future so significantly. (Felony convictions make it really hard to get a medical license and I have to pay off my student loans somehow. Besides, I’ll be in a much better position to make a meaningful difference as a physician than as a heavily indebted student or EMT.)

      • b3nsn0w@pricefield.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        this. you can pay little attention to politics without being a “centrist” who isn’t actually a centrist. news can be depressing as fuck, i’m hella glad i strongly limited my consumption of them, but that doesn’t mean i’m gonna start both-sidesing shit. (with the exception of tankies vs nazis, because those two are in fact the same authoritarian, anti-west, bigoted crap under different flags that love to larp against each other)

        • morrowind@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s what centrism is supposed to mean anyway. You don’t have to go into the whole both-sides-are-bad nonsense to be a centrist.

    • ophelia@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is my go-to response whenever anyone wants to start talking politics with me. Mainly because whenever someone wants to talk politics it’s usually not because they’re liberal and I really hate talking with people who just want to prove that their opinion is the right one.

      • Plus_a_Grain_of_Salt@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll admit I’ve used it for similar reasons. What I really should be saying is “I’m sorry, but I don’t want to talk about this right now.” Maybe I’ll even be brave and say “I don’t want to talk about this with you.” but it’s rare for me to find a person I don’t want to hear at all from. That usually comes up because they’ve already made their arguments, and I’ve already accepted or rebuttal the points to my own satisfaction. At that point they’ll talk themselves into circles looking for justification for parts of their stance, but unable to articulate it themselves. I’ll listen to anyone’s views at least once, given I’m in the right mindset, but I still wouldn’t date someone I don’t morally agree with. Life partners should have higher standards than conversation partners, and aligning values is a bare minimum for relationships.

      • _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        In my experience, that’s the case 100% of the time. I’ve never once in my 30+ years heard a liberal say the same thing. It’s always Nazis Republicans trying to deflect and sweep their shitty views under the rug because they think it’s some kind of trump card to get around their awful views and have civilized society allow them back in so they can spread their hate.

          • _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            No offense, but that’s exactly why we’re currently fighting fascism in America: apathetic folks like you that don’t care. Do you vote ever?

            • colin@lemmy.uninsane.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              1 year ago

              you know just like the “i’m apolitical” copout, there’s a similar copout along the lines of “well i voted (and didn’t do shit all other than that), so my hands are clean”.

              • _cerpin_taxt_@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Voting is the bare minimum, but if all you do is vote, you’re still a much better person than folks that don’t vote. If you get involved beyond that, even better. But absolutely nothing beyond just fucking voting is required to get involved, but most of the young folks still don’t vote.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think there’s a difference between someone who doesn’t pay attention to politics and someone who just doesn’t want to argue politics. Someone who doesn’t pay attention to politics at all is too sheltered and doesn’t understand the issues that have been going on and affect a lot of people, so a lot of those people don’t want to date someone who won’t be able to understand something vital to them and that has an effect on their lives. Especially since someone who hasn’t been paying attention likely doesn’t have a lot of the same principles and beliefs.

    • TurtleJoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bartend. I was working on Easter, and one of our semi regulars came in with a guy that she was obviously on a drink date with. They’d been at at least one other bar before they came in; they’d had a couple drinks, but weren’t past maybe tipsy.

      At one point, she mentioned that the reason the last place they’d been to was slow was likely that it happened to be Easter. At the mention of the word the guy interrupted with,

      “I REFUSE TO TALK ABOUT ANY POLITICS OR RELIGION!!”

      To me this was a sign that this dude cared very much about religion and politics, but just like how scientologists don’t drop the Xenu shit on you right away, he wanted to wait until any prospective partner was in too deep before revealing how abhorrent his views are.

      That regular isn’t my favorite person, but I was proud of her for pretty much ending that date after that.

      • TrontheTechie@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s another one of those.

        I’ve never had anyone who said politics and religion aren’t good conversation actually be worth having those conversations with. Everyone else from every other walk of life has no problem having a nuanced conversation about that stuff, it’s only ever WASPs that get all indignant and force everyone else to stop talking.

        One of my coworkers had asked something about trans people and bathrooms, and I started to say my piece, but mid sentence the owner comes back like “under no circumstances are you allowed to have this conversation here”.

        Oh yeah, so threatening to say that I don’t care who is in what bathroom if they don’t do anything that violates another guests bodily autonomy.

        So controversial and brave.

        We’ve spent plenty of time talking about the different racist inspired restaurants in the area and the deplorable dog whistle specials they offer, never cared about that offending anyone.

        The restaurant in question was the MoonCricket Grille, and they were offering $0.49 Bud lights after the outrage about them in honor of the 49 who died at the Pulse nightclub.

        I hate this place…

      • SquareRouteCanal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s literally a bar rule. Lol. Alcohol makes people talk like they are on the internet in real life. Doesn’t make sense to discuss nuance when you’ve been drinking especially with the touchy subjects.

    • IlllIIIlllIlllI@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      This 100%. To not care about politics means to not care about how the entity with a monopoly on violence wants to take your money against your will and allocate it. If you don’t care about that, then you and I are not going to get along.

      • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        wants to take your money against your will and allocate it

        Speak for yourself

        I pay my taxes with a smile because they mean my neighbours won’t ever be likely show up at my door to steal from me when they don’t have enough to eat. And that my brother can have his cancer treatments without paying the insane costs associated with those treatments. And that my mother can enjoy her garden for the last 20 years of her life instead of working until she croaks.

  • inactive@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    192
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good lord the replies to this are sad. Believe it or not it’s a perfectly reasonable expectation to only want to date someone whose core beliefs align with yours (and, y’know, actually respects your rights as an independent human being.)

    • PugJesus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      144
      ·
      1 year ago

      Conservatives: “The free market is superior! Deal with it!”

      Conservatives when the free market decides against them: “THIS IS LITERALLY SOCIALISM”

        • b3nsn0w@pricefield.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          1 year ago

          to be fair, the idea of voting with money still sucks because it gives some people a lot more votes than others, but when wannabe future billionaire conservatives can’t even get presently rich people to play along with their bootlicker bullshit that’s just funny

        • zeppo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not when they’re the ones boycotting businesses. “go woke go broke!!” is fantastic, according to the same people who are obsessed with opposing “cancel culture”.

        • democracy1984@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just because it’s you agree with the right to boycott a business, doesn’t mean you can’t disagree with certain boycotts.

          Just like how agreeing with the right to free speech doesn’t mean you agree with the speech of every single person.

      • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        1 year ago

        Conservatives hate the free market when it tells them that they’re free to go take a long walk off a short pier.

  • Nerdybynature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    1 year ago

    The last conservative I matched with was immediately bragging about being unvaccinated, was in his late 30’s, openly religious, desperate for kids.

    If you’re openly conservative, you’re baring your soul about women’s rights, and if women don’t want to sleep with you as a result, you made your damn bed.

    • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Some women dig that. Not every woman believes the same things you do. There’s even a thing called the quiver full movement where people like the duggars deliberately have as many children as possible to outnumber people like you.

      • 🐱TheCat@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        58
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most women (and men) believe the things their parents teach them.

        The thing with conservatives is they want to 1) prevent any other information flowing to these women, religious indoctrination only 2) get these women pregnant young so that they don’t have a chance to gain independence

        So yeah in those cases you have grown women who believe these things. The Duggars are an example of the ‘quiver full’ movement in action. Letting their son abuse their daughters young so that they get used to it and defend it as normal.

        • ruination@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          1 year ago

          My parents used to fearmonger the everliving shit about LGBTQ+ and abortion, and as a small kid I ate that shit up. But then at some point, my brain probably developed some modicum of critical thinking and thought, wait a minute, why in the world does it matter to me what people do with their own lives, if it doesn’t even affect me or anyone else for that matter? Why are my parents, along with every single bigot, incorrectly think that they are entitled to weigh in on someone else’s life decisions?

          Every single argument from them boils down to “because religion”, but as someone who was raised Catholic (agnostic now), one of the things that they taught me was quite literally to “love thy neighbour” and to not shit on people only because of their beliefs. So why are the very same people who taught me that now doing the opposite of what they preach, trying (and fortunately failing) to shit on other people just because they don’t have the same beliefs? “My religion says it’s not OK,” well they don’t believe in the same things you do and could not give less of a shit about what you believe, so why not just leave them alone and let them live their life? It was around that point that I realised they were just hypocrites, and absolutely nothing more.

          • XIN@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I grew up extremely conservative christian (homeschooled, no tv, women don’t work outside the house) and was taught that anything other than married man and women was evil.

            The thing is we were also taught critical thinking and logic albeit it was to compare “new teachings” against the bible. My parents always said since the bible is true [sic] it would stand up to any scrutiny. They thankfully never learned the lesson most christian leaders have that Christianity needs to be mandated for it to be effective. Obviously the bible did not hold up to logic and I’m now a proud atheist and in the process of healing.

            • ruination@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Man, that’s worse than what I experienced growing up. Out of curiosity, why did you decide to go with atheism? Personally, I’m agnostic (I think that’s the right term) because I see no compelling evidence or argument for either side, and I am of the opinion that a human’s finite brain could never even come close to figuring out the answer. And no, the Bible isn’t evidence, not one that’s even close to being the slightest bit rigorous at least. To me, it’s as much evidence for Christianity as the Harry Potter books are for wizardry.

              • kalibri@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                You’re confusing belief with knowledge.

                If you don’t believe in a deity, guess what, you’re an atheist regardless of whether you know for sure a god doesn’t exist or not.

                Most atheists are agnostic because it’s not on us to prove that a god doesn’t exist, no one should ever take the burden of proving a negative.

                • Syrc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s not entirely true, most definitions of Agnosticism frame it as a different position from Atheism.

                  Plus, you don’t have to prove something to believe it, if you’re convinced that there is no god you can define yourself an Atheist, that’s it. Agnostics are just “on the fence” and have no horse in the race.

              • XIN@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                The journey went: disappointment with God, angry at God, apathetic, agnostic, then atheist. I considered myself agnostic for a long time but it always felt a bit like a compromise for me, like it’s more palatable to think “Oh, I just don’t know one way or another” over seeing god as a stopgap for holes in knowledge.

                Rather than the approach of attributing less and less to the divine over time, I decided to attribute nothing and go from there.

                Saying that one can’t disprove god’s existence feels the same to me as saying a watermelon is blue inside until it’s observed.

                Thanks for your perspective!

                • ruination@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Regarding your last point, we only know that the flesh of a watermelon is indeed red because we’ve seen it before. If, say, an alien would suddenly come to Earth and be presented with a watermelon, they would not know what colour it is without cracking it open or otherwise probing it with various tools (granted of course that they perceive colour like we do)

                  Attributing nothing to the divine is also the way I go about it. We have scientific explanations for most phenomenon we see on a daily basis, and for those we do not, I do think we will find scientific explanations for them one day. None of the mysteries of the universe that would later be answered have been caused by the supernatural, so I have no reason to think it will be different.

                  However, I do think that a lack of observable trace of a “divine being” is not necessarily an evidence of nonexistence. To me, my agnosticism is not a form of compromise, but a recognition of the limitations of humans, as well as an acknowledgement relative inconsequence the question of whether a divine being exists or not is to the universe and to my own life. If nothing in my life or in the known universe can be attributed to the divine, why does it matter whether it exists or not? If an extraterrestrial exists in some distant galaxy, surely it would not matter to them whether I exist or not. That’s the way I think of the idea of divine beings.

                  Anyways, it’s kind of great to be able to ramble about this on the internet, most of the people I know are religious and unfortunately would not be very tolerant of this type of viewpoint.

        • Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You seem to have confused Conservative politics with Fundamentalist Christianity. They are separate ideals but hard to find separately currently. Somebody can be a fiscal conservative and not buy into the social fundamental conservative position.

        • democracy1984@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That has nothing to do with conservatism. Just because some people who are conservative said that, doesn’t mean that that’s a part of it. Please attack specific ideas, not groups of people.

      • Sage the Lawyer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s been Catholicism’s playbook since day one. There’s a reason they’re so against any kind of sex that doesn’t lead to procreation.

        Course, it also used to be rooted in the fact that medicine was trash for a long time, and a lot of kids died, so you’d want to have as many as you could to give some a shot at living a full life. But that’s not the case anymore, so yeah, the only reasons to have as many kids as possible is as you say, to outnumber the sane people, and to keep the working class populated, so we inch closer and closer to Idiocracy becoming reality every day.

        But hey, look at those shareholder’s profits!

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t know why. I’m about as pale as you can get, and it is by far the WEAKEST of skin colors. We literally cannot go out in the sun without protection.

            Sure, everyone should wear sunscreen, but I can get burnt walking out to the mailbox!

            • theangryseal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah. Sounds like you have fine genes my friend. The best genes.

              Have you considered endless breeding?

              Not only is it a lot of fun, but you can pass on those great genes you got there.

              For real though, I have a red headed daughter and one that should have been a redhead. She got everything but the hair. The freckles, the pale blue eyes. A beam of light comes through the window and she starts smoking. Someone turns on a 100W lightbulb and she blisters. I get what you’re saying.

      • Nerdybynature@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Accidentally deleted but yeah I’ve noticed an influx of conservative men matching with me despite clear indications that I’m liberal. Unfortunately I do know these sorts of women exist, but maybe conservative men should seek them out instead of someone clearly liberal who doesn’t want to make their body a baby factory.

          • Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            "Hey girl, why don’t you take those shoes off and come into the kitchen?

            Oh yeah, you like those historic gender roles don’t you… 😘"

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Alternately, because she’s attractive and some guys are idiots. For some guys “looks” overrides everything else.

            It’s unreal how many guy will date a flat out manipulative, immature, mean asshole because she’s “hot”. Compared to that a decent human being is a catch, regardless of if they’re fundamentally incompatible.

      • Nerdybynature@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        If there’s women who dig it, that’s their bag, but I’ve absolutely experienced an influx of conservative dudes trying to match with me and I’m openly liberal. Wild that these women exist but the dudes don’t seem as into them.

        • coffeelovingkitty@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because these guys don’t want the full trade off of gender roles the conservatives promote. Many conservative women expect dating with the intent of marriage and at some point having the husband be able to support a household where the wife stays home and takes care of the house and children.

      • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        You say that kind of like it sounds like a good strategy to you? Sounds like a fucked way to think about society to me

  • popemichael@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    1 year ago

    I almost dated a conservative but covid saved me.

    The moment it hit, her conservative powers went omega level and I was able to dodge a bullet by wanting to vaccinate early

  • dottedgreenline@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being ok with being conservative is akin to being ok with being stupid. It’s basically an admission of idiocy.

      • regeya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ignorance is a choice, too. I’ve met so many people who are proud of being ignorant. I once met a woman who was in her mid 30s who was explicitly against learning new things because…reasons?

        • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Gonna have to agree to disagree on that one, barring very different understandings of the word “stupidity.” Cognition and action are different things, and pretending they’re the same doesn’t improve the efficacy of interventions.

    • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously, conservatives want to pretend like we’re all just regular people so what do our political views matter right? But if The last 8 years have taught me anything it is that every conservative is some level of a bigot, even if you can get along with them, purely based off their political goals. Sorry, you can’t just work your ass off to deny people rights and sequester people you don’t like, then call it a “political view”.

  • HornyOnMain🏳️‍⚧️@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    ngl, last time some conservative started flirting with me she got pissed of when i said i wasnt interested because they were a tory flag shagger, and then she called me a slur because im queer

      • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        When you don’t actively kick out the terrible people in your group, you are making a choice to say “this is something I am willing to tolerate.” So I’ll ask, if you are a conservative and recognize that there are bad actors in your conservative party, are you calling out those bad actors? Or just putting your head down and joining rank and file because your party told you to?

        • democracy1984@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Also, it’s basically impossible to get rid of supreme court justices, and for good reason. It allows them to rule on cases based only on what they legitimately believe to be the correct decision. The supreme court’s job isn’t to decide right from wrong, it’s to decide legal from illegal. If you don’t like their ruling, the way to change it should be through Congress, not though the courts.

        • democracy1984@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not a member of a political party. I vote for candidates, not parties. If you just vote for a specific party, which ever one that may be, that’s lazy. I don’t care if they’re republican or democrat, I care about what they value.

          Also, you can’t really actively kick out member from a party, all you can do is just not vote for them.

          • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            This is so hilariously uneducated to the current political situation that I really hope you’re arguing in bad faith instead of just that stupid.

            • democracy1984@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              It doesn’t matter what the political situation is, you should vote for specific candidates, not just blindly vote for your party, whichever one that may be, and then call anyone who doesn’t fully support your party evil.

              • Sharkwellington@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                It doesn’t matter what the political situation is

                You seem like an idealist, which I have some respect for, but you also have to account for reality. And the reality is, we don’t really vote for individual candidates anymore. We vote for one party or the other to have an additional vote. Elected politicians hardly ever vote outside of their party anymore. It’s not ideal but it is reality. If you vote for multiple candidates of different political parties, you’re just making noise.

                • democracy1984@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  And that’s a bad systematic problem. But voting based on the candidate should help to slowly fix it. While there is a very clear difference between democrat and republican, there are still differences between candidates of the same party.

                  If you vote only for the candidates that are closest to the center, then candidates will compete to be closer. But if you just vote for a party, then the candidates have to no incentive to compete.

  • “Why won’t women, objects meant to feed and pleasure me, give me the time of day like this super old-ass book I had read and interpreted to me by someone who is likely a child molester said they should? Do they worship Saytahn?”

  • Zednix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    You should date someone with at least some reasonable overlap of ideals. If you wish to have a family unit, like conservatives certainly do, you need to have common ground and mutual respect or you will end up with yet another single mother raising a potentially negative statistic and father losing his child or bailing.

    • Dodecahedron December@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      So what you’re saying is: relationships require respect? Yeah, that’s one reason a lot of leftism is built upon respect for one another. Conservatism, the best I can understand stand it relies on feeding an outdated lie that there are multiple classes of people, some being better and more deserving than others.

      But yeah, you don’t respect your partner you lose your partner, but that does not a conservative or conservative argument make.

      • Deuces@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Do you not have an overlapping fundamental agreement with your partner about how the world works and what’s moral values are most important?

        Like you’re not gonna agree on everything I know, but “are some people inherently better than others, should a justice system focus on punishment or rehabilitation, is education valuable for society, was the earth created by evolution or God, do you want kids(+ a couple questions if “yes”)” are, in my mind, things you need to agree on with the person you intend to share your life with.

      • Zednix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh no, you gotta figure out what sort of situation works for you. It is beneficial to find someone that has some overlapping ideals as yourself, heck most of your friends and you probably already have some overlap you may not have thought about.

  • toaster@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This kind of shit was a big motivation for me to leave reddit, and now it’s already on Lemmy. Great.

    You can have right leaning beliefs and not be a bigot. Hell, I’m not even right leaning but many of my friends and family are. They are not racist, sexist, transphobic… This kind of post just makes the left look childish.

    ETA: you can have conservative views and not vote republican. The republican party is a fucking joke.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s not true; I’d date someone I could reasonably discuss fiscal policy about taxation with.

    So maybe it’s not so much they won’t date you because you’re conservative and more that you’re openly embracing fascism…

    • Bristlecone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why is it the only time I ever hear the word “fiscal” is when a conservative is defending their entire half of the political sphere 😂 let’s all look past the human rights abuses and absurd gerrymandering/rigging of the entire democratic system and just think about the “fiscal responsibility” aspect (That, paradoxically, only ever actually seems to drive the national debt up faster when conservatives are in charge)

        • BringMeTheDiscoKing@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course not. What’s unreasonable is the tribalistic, us vs them attitude based on poorly applied labels that leave no room for constructive discussion.

          People calling themselves “Conservatives” these days are actually reformers who are about the least conservative bunch you’ll ever find. No true Scotsman conservative would join a death cult.

          • ThatWeirdGuy1001@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Except they still call themselves conservatives and they still keep voting for people who openly state they want to oppress women and minorities

            You can’t explain your way out of it the mask is off. If you identify as conservative in modern America you are undeniably supporting fascist ideologies.