I use the apps my friends use but it gets tiring to keep up with so many.

  • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That was the time when all the apps were standard XMPP. It didn’t have proper encryption back then. WhatsApp is still XMPP nowadays, but excluding federation and non-standard implementation on Meta servers and so on

    • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      8 months ago

      It didn’t have proper encryption back then.

      OTR predates all the commercial platforms adopting XMPP, so that’s not exactly true.

      • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Was OTR a protocol where the server had zero knowledge of the unencrypted content? Or was it basically like SSL?

      • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Sure, but now you show me all the clients that supported OTR back then 😜 - or now, for that matter. Besides, OTR doesn’t work in multi user chats. OMEMO does, and support for it is still not exactly widespread…

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Most popular clients supported OTR back then… Pidgin, Gajim, Adium, bitlbee, Psi, you name it.

          And that’s at a time where absolutely no one did E2E, even SSL wasn’t a given.

          Yes OTR* doesn’t do group chat, but now you’re just moving the goalpost.

          *There has been a proposal in the works for years and years, but OMEMO stole a lot of it’s traction, and the last nail in the coffin was the arrest of Ola Bini in Ecuador as he was one of the main contributors.

          You seem to not get that OMEMO is directly based on OTR.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Federated XMPP is fun yes, defederated XMPP is, indeed, not fun.

          Also I’m no Christ’s brother, thanks. Beelzebub maybe.

        • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Had no idea about Zoom!

          It’s kind of crazy that all these services use it, and on the federated side of things, Signal killed it.

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            It also powers the communications / presence on many gaming avenues as well like Fortnite, League of Legends, & whatever Nintendo is using for notifications + online status (assuredly a lot more games).

            XMPP is old, stable, & massively scalable for industrial applications – while maintaining decentralization + efficiency & allowing for extensibility like OMEMO encryption which is covering most folk’s chat use cases. Since the XMPP foundation don’t put budget into marketing & hype, a lot of folks weirdly assume it’s dead or not being used. It’s strange to me how folks seem more interested in RCS & Matrix despite their histories/ownership/flaws rather than embracing what is already good.

              • toastal@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                We can start it up again. Time to nudge in the next Lemmy AMA to allow XMPP addresses alongside Matrix. You’d be surprised how little things like that can nudge adoption & pique curiosity.

                • wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  While that’s true, I think the people who care have inherent issues with the lack of social network graph anonimity sadly

            • bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              Yeah, XMPP is great and all, but the client side is a big old mess, everything is full of friction and missing support for feature xyz. Have you tried using XMPP on iOS?

              • toastal@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Conversations compliance test has brought most clients into an acceptable base to where most basic chat/audio/video needs are met, so if you are comparing older legacy clients then the experience will be different. The XEP system means everything is optional & can be pitched by making a spec & seeing who uptakes the idea. It also means the bar to create your own server is absoluetly minimal since everything is an extension which means you could build one in a weekend which is great for those learning to code since the barrier to entry is extremely low if Conversations isn’t the goal.

                IDGAF about Apple since you have to have a wad just to publish an application on their proprietary store & the EU didn’t do a good enough job so it’s expensive to open alternative stores like F-Droid while also being antagonistic towards sideloading as well as PWAs (not to mention needing to buy their overpriced hardware to build/release applications). Heck, you can’t even publish a GPL-or-similar-licensed app on their store. This is a giant slap in the face to free/ethical software developers & probably why the clients aren’t in a good state; if you aren’t trying to make money, why would you develop in an ecosystem that is entirely hostile for you to develop in?