so, people that look good in moving pictures are called clipgenic, i guess.

one does not always complement the others. they can look good in one medium, but not on the other medium.

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Are there actually photogenic people who look worse on video or irl?

    If they’re photogenic surely they just look good all the time, I can’t think of any examples of photogenic looking worse on video.

    • 9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Photos are generally composed, so someone can easily be photogenic from conventional photography angles and always look good.

      Video is often never composed frame-by-frame to the level of a photo, so it’s a lot more likely to get less than flattering angles, which would lead to this.

      I think someone being video-genic would probably be less common than photogenic because it implies you effortlessly look great from any angle

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’ve never seen someone who looks good in photos but not videos, but I suppose it could happen if they only have one or two really good angles. Most people look different through a camera lens or in real life, though, some better in one or the other, some good in both, but still different.