• assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d say fourth quintile but I’m personally biased and I do agree with pretty much everything you’re saying. It’s wild to me that we have a flat constant as the minimum wage and not a formula that takes into consideration your district’s cost of living. Ideally we’d have:

    Min Wage for District A = Federal Constant + k*Cost of Living in A

    It would need to be coupled with some sort of gerrymandering prevention so that districts were more representative of state areas. You’d need large cities to be their own district in this scheme.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think voting districts and localized COL need to be tied together, but I’d sell a kidney to fix the gerrymandering shit so yeah, still agreed.

      • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the best way I can think of defining an area for CoL without screwing someone over. On the state level it would be heavily skewed still. Maybe counties?

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          County is def how I would do it. They’re more localized and self-governing and can more quickly make adjustments as needed.