• catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Probably because it’s not safe to drive them around giant pickups who can’t see over their hoods

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      84
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Europe and Japan all have freight trucks driving around, so I don’t buy that. The fact that many states won’t allow these is American truck manufacturing protectionism, nothing more. It’s the same reason you can only get a 3/4 or 1 ton truck from Ford, Chevy, or Ram (chicken tax).

      • jaspersgroove@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Cab over engine freight trucks with excellent visibility, not jacked up chevys where your view of the ground starts 20 feet in front of you

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          And that’s precisely because the option isn’t readily available here. We can argue merits of different countries versus the US, but at the end of the day it is what it is unless something changes at the legislative level.

          When say a contractor goes to purchase a work vehicle, the option is either a van, which have pathetic motors and hauling capabilities, or a pickup from one of the big 3 that can be outfitted with a utility body. Sometimes you can score one of those Isuzu cabovers, but they’re typically outfitted with a full sized box on the chassis, and they’re far and few between, and often more expensive. Vans are also stupid expensive, especially 4x4 models, because of the van life crowd. The options really are much more limited than other parts of the world, and I truly believe it’s to keep prices high and the money vacuum humming. Plus, you can find an older utility body truck for a fraction of the cost of a used van (I just did this 6 months ago; granted I’m in California, so my experience may not be the norm).

          I ended up buying a Ram 2500 when looking for a work truck. I would’ve loved a 25/35 class van, but I need 4x4 (mountains, snow), and because of the premium those models fetch due to demand from the van life people, that wasn’t an option.

          And I dunno about other people, but I know what’s in front of my truck at all times. It really isn’t that hard to mind your surroundings.

        • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Sure, but as I responded to someone else, show me a viable option that’s readily available in the states for a contractor or someone delivering heavy stuff that has the power and 4x4 to do the thing at a reasonable price. I’m all for getting some of these European/Japanese solutions over here, but they simply aren’t available or affordable, and so we’re stuck with oversized pickups and under powered vans until something changes.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Just noting as a reference these trucks are 11ft long, a Miata is roughly 20% longer at 13ft.

          • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I didn’t really intend for it to be a comparison or supporting the narrative these trucks are ‘too small for America’, I just find many people hear small truck and imagine “like a ford ranger but a little less”, as their starting reference point. Gotta go smaller, scale is tough.

            • sparky1337@ttrpg.network
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 months ago

              My bad. It just seems like the low hanging fruit everyone plays off of.

              We actually used to get vehicles close to this size. The Suzuki samurai (really a jimny) was sold here for a number of years. Geo sold a fair number of almost kei cars that Suzuki made.

              I’m a fan of limiting them from interstate highways, but keeping them registrable. It’s just dumb they cite “safety” even though the law explicitly calls out they aren’t required to be safe. I just want a nice 25-45 mph city truck to lug dirty junk around.

              But if anyone is curious, Douglas deBoard imported so many European cars in the 80’s that cut into the profits of Mercedes USA enough that they pushed the law through. Buying them in Europe and importing them was actually cheaper (in some aspects) than buying a US market one. And the imported cars were better equipped!

              It wasn’t even about protecting American manufacturers or trucks. Mercedes has just always been a huge dick.

              • kalpol@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                6 months ago

                No lie. Gray market Mercedes were awesome. Way more powerful and you could get base models with zero cruft - manual transmissions and wind up windows.

    • blazera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      This is how we got in this mess, an arms race of trying to feel safe around larger and larger hunks of metal on the road. Americans just have to endanger everyone else for their own peace of mind.

      • caffinatedone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Smart cars had to pass US crash test standards and have the appropriate safety equipment. The kei trucks that you can currently import and use are 25+ years old and wouldn’t have even passed US standards back then. Your legs are the crumple zone in these things.

        I assume that new ones would have a chance, but it’d be expensive for a manufacturer to modify and certify for the US market. Small cars haven’t sold well here, and the profit margins are slim.

        Maybe with the recent size and price increases in autos here, well see some movement. I’d love a modern Honda kei to go with my element.

        • Sentient_Modem@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          The crumple zone thing is a bit grey as the USA sells and allows trucks like the Isuzu NPR/Chevy Cab Over.

        • Tikiporch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I get all that, but the individual I replied to only related small size to safety. I was merely pointing out that size isn’t a factor.

          I appreciate your post, and agree completely! A Kei truck would satisfy all my requirements for a utility vehicle.

      • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m sorry, their problem is that the massive trucks are somehow in danger because they weren’t designed to handle being hit by a vehicle less than half its size?

        What a ridiculous statement.

        • Live Your Lives@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          6 months ago

          That’s not what they are saying at all. They’re saying small vehicles aren’t even safe in crashes with other small vehicles, let alone with bigger vehicles.

        • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          They took a street legal Smart ForTwo…

          Then crashed it into a little electric truck and a golf cart…

          And they want stuff to be as safe as the Smart car.

    • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      6 months ago

      Ya. Everything’s expensive, so people buy the cheapest thing [with four wheels]. I don’t want folks on the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum to think these are a safe option.

      If(?) a ‘90s Honda sedan is safer but the Kei is new and looks cute, for the same price many will choose the less safe option.

      Eight Californians die on our roads every day here and I can’t wait for some solutions. I really do empathize with everyone you readers care about (no oil companies, no just-for-funsies-truck manufacturers) - I hate the thought of crumpled and crushed human bodies.