• n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m Canadian, so I’m well versed in softwood lumber dispute. However, we’re talking about EVs.

    • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      We’re talking about EVs and not comprehending my post, apparently.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m just not sure what your argument is. Since the US practices unfair trade in one industry, China should be allowed to in other industries? I don’t know if you missed this lesson in second grade, but, “Two wrongs don’t make a right.”

        • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s not a matter of “allow”, it’s a matter of what governments choose to subsidize. There’s no point in getting pissy at China for subsidizing an industry to the detriment of other countries when the US actively does it in other industries. The US could do the same with batteries and EVs, but there’s no political will.