Thus, conservatism and neoliberalism are, in reality, the radical agenda…

  • snooggums@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Nope.

    Conservative as a label in politics vs conservative as in slow to change are as different as theory in science and how lay people use theory to mean speculation.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Oh, I’m well aware political and ideological “conservatism” is like North Korean “democracy” — nothing more than a hollow, objectively false, virtue signal.

      I just find it hilarious that the literal definition of conservative is the opposite. It’s so comical it’s like an allegory of their entire being. Like they fundamentally, to their very core, can’t be trusted…

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Conservative in politics is the same as in conservative in using the gas pedal, conservative in how much butter one puts on toast, conservative in estimates.

      It’s about using as little as possible. As in “small government”.

      A liberal helping of mashed potatoes is a big helping. A conservative golf swing is one designed to keep the ball from going too far. It’s the same concept when applied to politics.

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        If that was true conservatives wouldn’t be trying to speedrun the running longstanding public programs into the ground or overturning decades of precedent.

        They don’t mean the same thing.