alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1901arrow-down184
arrow-up1817arrow-down1imageIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareamki@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 year agoNo. Programs cannot reprogram themselves in a useful way and are very very far from it.
minus-squarelegion02@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoEh, I’d say continuous training models are pretty close to this. Adapting to changing conditions and new input is kinda what they’re for.
minus-squareBjornir@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoVery far from reprogramming though. The general shape of the NN doesn’t change, you won’t get a NN made to process images to suddenly process code just by training it.
minus-squareyum13241@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoThen how does polymorphic/self-modifying code work?
minus-squareamki@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoIt doesn’t or do you have serious applications for self-modifying code?
minus-squareyum13241@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoSome use it for causing millions of dollars in damage.
No. Programs cannot reprogram themselves in a useful way and are very very far from it.
Eh, I’d say continuous training models are pretty close to this. Adapting to changing conditions and new input is kinda what they’re for.
Very far from reprogramming though. The general shape of the NN doesn’t change, you won’t get a NN made to process images to suddenly process code just by training it.
Then how does polymorphic/self-modifying code work?
It doesn’t or do you have serious applications for self-modifying code?
Some use it for causing millions of dollars in damage.