- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- technews@radiation.party
- cross-posted to:
- hackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
- technews@radiation.party
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
In Moscow, the former Google engineer James Williams – who has become the most important philosopher of attention in the western world – told me I had made a crucial mistake.
It might, for a short period of time, keep certain effects at bay, but it’s not sustainable, and it doesn’t address the systemic issues.” He said that our attention is being deeply altered by huge invasive forces in wider society.
Saying the solution was to just adjust your own habits – to pledge to break up with your phone, say – was just “pushing it back on to the individual” he said, when “it’s really the environmental changes that will really make the difference”.
We could, for example, force social media companies to abandon their current business model, which is specifically designed to invade our attention in order to keep us scrolling.
Some scientists say these worries about attention are a moral panic, comparable to the anxieties in the past about comic books or rap music, and that the evidence is shaky.
We will have – as the former Google engineer Tristan Harris told me – downgraded humanity, stripping us of our attention at the very time when we face big collective crises that require it more than ever.
The original article contains 3,640 words, the summary contains 210 words. Saved 94%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!