I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 个月前

    I don’t think they really helped with the financing

    All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

    I’m surprised to see a sympathetic comment like this from an account on an instance that has them defederated

    Identity politics from .ml?

    If you’re surprised at such small acts of individual praxis, you’d be amazed at what we’ve accomplished in groups.

    • TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 个月前

      All the computational resources the users tested the code base on must’ve been free.

      fair enough I just think of direct monetary donations or something when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

      Identity politics from .ml?

      I mean kinda? I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 个月前

        when I see financing like that but looking at like that isn’t incorrect

        None of the devs got paid. There are no other expenses.

        I normally expect people who hold sympathies towards hexbear to use an account on like lemm.ee so they don’t have to use more than one account to browse everything they want to see

        You expect the convenient implementation of MLK’s white moderate. But, my content should give no indication of that stereotype.

        I’ll answer your previous question: I’ve personal accounts on world, ee, ml, and hexbear. The fediverse doesn’t limit viewing content from multiple accounts concurrently. One must only choose an account to post. The only obstacle to such a tool is a means to avoid burdening the fediverse with duplicate responses to content requests. We solved that problem in a few hours.

        If you want actual insight communicated properly then you should ask in the correct venue. For example, I’d have no issue explaining in nuance on hexbear because the majority has a strong understanding or conversion of theory to praxis. I’m not even needed. Others would adequately explain on my behalf.

        • TraitorToAmerica@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 个月前

          I think my comments have been too ambiguous then, I didn’t mean for anything I’ve said to come across as hostile in any way, I apologize. I’m a lemmygrad user, made this account because I browse through .ml at work and been meaning to make one so i can comment while there.

          • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            3 个月前

            I’ve perceived only good faith from your posts. I apologize if I’ve not demonstrated that in my responses. It’s difficult to do here.

              • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                2 个月前

                Based on this interaction I’ve realized my perception of lemmygrad is hypocritical: My experience indicates that our shallow, automated and wide scope language analysis likely isn’t human truth. I’ve decided to spend more time there.

                Thank you for risking good faith engagement when it’s not popular or politic. Iron sharpens iron.