GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy did not back down Sunday when questioned about comments he made during a campaign stop in Iowa Friday, calling Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) part of the “modern KKK.”
“I stand by what I said to provoke an open and honest discussion in this country,” Ramaswamy said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
Why am I seeing so many posts about this guy? Why are people giving him so much attention? He seems to be pulling straight from Trump’s playbook, playing the media to get constant attention, and people are falling for it.
For one simple and depressing reason - people click on it. That’s the dopamine button for modern media outlets online; those clicks are the cash register ringing.
If you want to figure out a way to elevate the discourse you have to disrupt the payment model - at the end of the day people do what gets them paid. Doubly so when the harm it causes is anonymized by operating in corporate aggregates.
No one is getting paid to post the stuff here. They’re just falling for his bull shit.
Of course not, that isn’t what I mean. I’m taking about why media in general reports as “straight news” the inflammatory blathering of political figures. Whether you as the reader agree with it or not, these kind of statements in headlines get the publisher clicks.
Clicks == revenue for for the media site, so they are incentivized to provide more content like that. Politicians need exposure more than just about anything, so they tend more towards that kind of language in part to get greater exposure through those venues.
I don’t think people posting content like this to aggregators like lemmy are in that incentivizing loop directly, but users engaging with the content even if they hate does incentivize the behavior further(albeit in a very small, incremental way).
Underrated comment. Can’t upvote more.
I think you answered your own question. He’s playing the Trump bit. Saying extreme things to get news headlines and people talking about him. And it’s working to some extent.
I guess I figured people would see through it by now. I also have a naive expectation that journalists will have some integrity and not fall for this stuff. The media handed Trump the election in 2016, by falling for his stuff, and if Trump is too wrapped up with this trial to see things through and is base starts to falter, it seems like the media and anointed Vivek to take them. He may be more dangerous than Trump, which is hard to believe.
Because the media learned nothing from trump
Or worse, they learned that a bigoted blowhard is good for ratings.
Best response is to down vote and ignore it.
Yeah I’ll start doing that, and start saying to people that talk about that you don’t care. It’s annoying how predictable we are as humans sometimes
People and the media didn’t learn from trump that they should not feed the crazy
Oh they learned alright. They do this not because they didn’t learn their lesson but because they did. Actual journalism and reporting is ALWAYS second to shit articles that are wrong in order to be the first one out the door, click bait the article title, showcase the fascists for the rage bait, etc.
They exist to make money and so the lessons learned revolve solely around finance. Whey would they learn anything else? This shit is working for them