Android phones for example

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    I guess I’m going to be that guy today. Android is Linux, and it’s installed on a lot of mobile devices already.

    • mkwt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Another aspect to this is that Android is Linux, but it is not GNU / Linux. This is true both in the literal sense of not using GNU coreutils or glibc, and also in the broader sense.

      What I mean by the “broader” sense:

      • no X or Wayland
      • GTK or Qt support is something an application has to bring with them.
      • filesystem is substantially reorganized
      • users and system permissions setup substantially differently

      To the application programmer Android / Linux looks like a completely different ball game.

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 days ago

        What prevents Linux from being installed on mobile devices?

        Android is Linux, but it is not GNU / Linux

        You’ll see that’s not the question that was asked. And it’s okay not to give Stallman any more validation for his fame-grab.

    • JetpackJackson@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 days ago

      And you can (sometimes) install something like PostmarketOS which is closer to the kind of linux people think about when they hear “Linux”

    • sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      8 days ago

      Android is maintaining a fork of Linux kernel that has since diverged.

      Its like saying MAC is UNIX, technically yes but not really

      • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        Its like saying MAC is UNIX, technically yes but not really

        macOS is UNIX-based. Period. In fact, “[s]tarting with Leopard, macOS has been certified as compatible with the Single UNIX Specification version 3 (SUSv3).” Source

      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        macOS definitely is Unix. In the literal sense that it is actually certified (unlike FreeBSD, for example), and it is very much Unix-y under the hood.

      • stupidcasey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        As far as I can tell literally everything (except for windows) is UNIX, it isn’t exactly a high bar to pass, it’s like saying all drinks are water based which is technically true but I’m not going to give a kid a wine box when I run out of juice boxes.