• Acat114@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any reason why you believe that? Just more turnover and knowledge sharing?

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Think about who would have the time and money to run for office when there’s high turnover. It’s the wealthy fucks.

      I think a better approach is improving candidate quality. More of us need to run for office.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Freshmen members of Congress have few/no connections and ability to make deals. They often network via more senior members. Without these structures in place, and especially without long-term accountability to their constituents, they are highly incentivized to simply follow the money and cash out.

      People always like to say politicians are dishonest thieves in the pocket of various interests, but politicians vote with their constituents an overwhelming percentage of the time and regularly enjoy high levels of support from constituents even when Congress’s approval ratings are in the toilet.

      People like their representatives, and want the rest of Congress to be more like them, more often than not

      Couple the above with the massive churn term limits would oppose and the broken gerrymander/primary system that rewards the most extreme candidates, and you have a recipe for disaster.