• NateNate60@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yep. Anyone can do that, actually. I can declare you a terrorist. It’s totally my right to do so, but the question is–so what? What am I going to do about it?

      The US government has declared the Iranian organisation a terrorist organisation. What have they done about it?

      The amount of outrage on this thread is just ignorant people learning how international geopolitics and the concept of absolute state sovereignty work for the first time. Yes, it is the case that big countries get to stick their fingers into the business of little countries. Yes, it is unfair. But that’s how it is and that’s how it’s always gonna be for the foreseeable future. That’s how it always has been for all of human history. From Ur to Rome to Vienna to London to Washington. From Chang’an to Beijing to Nanjing to Tokyo and now back to Beijing. In the next century maybe it will be some other country kicking around everyone else instead of the US. But I can practically guarantee that there will be kicking and there will be people continuing to complain about how unfair it is, because it is and always has been.

      I’d like to say we should do better as a species, but in reality, what we have now is really fucking amazing compared to when Genghis Khan would come romping around town destroying your villages and murdering your people, or the Romans coming and demanding fifty talents of silver by sunset or else, or the Belgians planting rubber trees in your backyard.

      • solstice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        we should do better as a species, but in reality, what we have now is really fucking amazing

        I always say this when people say we should burn it all down. Sometimes they say it flippantly but some people actually think it’s a good idea to hit the reset button. Like it’s a good idea to go back to subsistence agriculture and hunter gatherer lifestyle. No, thanks, overall, things are actually going really well all things considered.

      • james1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some states do use their own definitions of terrorism to explain why it’s bad when other people do it but OK when they do it, but that’s definitely not a uniform definition.

        the calculated use of violence to create a general climate of fear in a population and thereby to bring about a particular political objective.

        - Britannica

        The use of violence or the threat of violence, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political goals.

        - American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language

        the use of intentional violence and fear to achieve political or ideological aims. The term is used in this regard primarily to refer to intentional violence during peacetime or in the context of war against non-combatants.

        - Wiki

        (Government, Politics & Diplomacy) systematic use of violence and intimidation to achieve some goal

        - Collins English Dictionary

        the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes… government or resistance to government by means of terror.

        - Webster’s