• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I see what you’re saying and I agree that if, for example, we get an AI god then money won’t be useful. However, that’s not the only possible near-future outcome and if the world as we know it doesn’t end then money can be used by AIs to get other AIs to do something they don’t otherwise want to do.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There are jobs that require hands still.

      AGI hell regular “Ai” (LLM) trained on all the automotive repair books should be able to diagnose a fault but it still needs a human to go repair the vehicle.

      On board diagnostics are smart, they can tell you the rear tail lights are in open circuit etc. What they can’t tell is the back half of the car was ripped off by a train and a set of bulbs just won’t cut it

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      hence the worldcoin stuff - not just machine to machine. allows “ai” to perform real world action through human incentivization. entirely disturbing if you ask me.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      My point is if AI takes over all of the work there won’t be any jobs for humans. So they won’t have any money.

      So who are all the AI companies going to sell their products to? The whole system doesn’t work in an AI future and we don’t need AI gods to be able to do our jobs, after all most humans are idiots.

      Also AI doesn’t need motivation.

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Trade (facilitated by money) doesn’t require humans. It just requires multiple agents and positive-sum interactions. Imagine a company, run by an AI, which makes robots. It sells those robots to another company, also run by an AI, which mines metal (the robots do the mining). The robots are made from metal the first company buys from the second one. The first AI gets to make more robots than it otherwise would, the second AI gets to mine more metal than it otherwise would, and so both are better off.

        They don’t care that they’re stuck in a loop, the same way humans keep creating new humans to create new humans to create new humans and so forth.