• Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then this is irrelevant for them because they wouldn’t be using Google’s Messages application. They’d be using another one.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google Messages replaced the AOSP SMS app, and is the only app that provides support for E2EE RCS and standard RCS if your carrier has not provided their own.

        It’s also one of the few mainstream mesaaging apps that won’t have a hissy fit about being installed on a rooted device

        Edit: Ah, my point got lost. There is no other app on Android that will let you do RCS mesaaging from a desktop.

      • inasaba@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s the only app that has RCS. I don’t use it, but I think it’s kind of terrible that Google has a monopoly on the format.

        • MindlessZ@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s terrible that no one else has decided to make an rcs app? That’s not really under googles control

          • Dandroid@dandroid.app
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Google has blocked anyone’s ability to make an RCS app by making the API a system-level API. In order to make an RCS app, you must make an Android device. So Samsung could make one and bundle it with their phones, but Textra can’t make one and make it available on the Play Store.

            • MindlessZ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Ah ok, other replies mentioned API access in relation to servers so I misunderstood the issue. It looks like that API is hardlocked to Google (and Samsung?) devices. Thanks for the info

              • Dandroid@dandroid.app
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Samsung was just an example. I have been out of the Android development game for a while now, so my information might be outdated, but back when I worked for an android device maker (Android 5 timeframe), any Android device maker could use the system level APIs. You just needed to sign your app the the same keys your Android source code was compiled with.

          • butter@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They won’t open the api. Anyone else who tries to make one would be starting from scratch. Including with a server

            • MindlessZ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but isn’t that just complaining that Google runs the largest implementation of RCS? It would’ve been great if this was handled by carriers, but they never would pick up the task so Google just did it inhouse. I think if they hadn’t rcs would just be dead by now (for better or worse)

          • inasaba@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s because Google hasn’t allowed anyone else access to the RCS API, actually.

            • MindlessZ@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Google doesn’t open their own RCS API to the public. Nobody is stopping you from running your own server and service so far as I can tell