• Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I wanted to search for unverified info or misinfo, I could, but almost always I am lookkng for factual and sourced information. Please don’t force me to do otherwise.

      • DigitalJacobin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s how all search engines fundamentally work though. The whole point if that they try to bring the most relevant results to the top and downrank things like spam and unhelpful/irrelevant results. Downranking misinfo spam websites isn’t “censorship”. Not ranking resullts would make search engines completely pointless.

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’d disagree with equating disinfo with spam. Spam seems easier to classify, sites that try to get ahead by having nonsense keywords or whatever and want to sell you something. Dis- or misinfo is trickier, you need to decide what is correct info. Do you understand what I mean?

          • biddy@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Absolutely those things are different. But the point of a search engine is to, crudely and algorithmically, sort out both.