• Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    There has never, ever been anything approaching a protest that starts with the words "sitting out”.

    Sitting out has definitely been a form of protest. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_bus_boycott

    The Montgomery bus boycott didn’t start with sitting out. It started with Rosa Parks sitting in.

    Not to mention the easily understood fact that an economic boycott - one which causes direct material consequences - has absolutely no relation to some sort of “political boycott”, which causes zero consequences against anyone in power.

    Hell democracy is measured by political votes, a nation with low voter turn out are considered non democratic.

    Yes? Congratulations, you are therefore contributing to our continued democratic decline.

    • squid_slime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      This same argument can be used with electoral protest. It would be disingenuous to say none voting in protest materialised from nothing.

      Yes? Congratulations, you are therefore contributing to our continued democratic decline.

      I don’t see your point. If people aren’t voting then that is a symptom and not a cause. I think also a nuanced lens helps with this. People not voting isn’t binary. some knowingly protest, some are seeing the slow encroachment of inequality and just couldn’t care less which leader will continue to fuck them over.

      • Initiateofthevoid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Not voting is absolutely both a symptom and a cause. How do you think we got here, if not by voting for the people who won the elections for the past century, and by not voting for the people who lost the elections?

        • squid_slime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          The reason the Republicans won is that billionaires are funding campaign, popularism is on the rise, class consciousness is low.