This guy tweeted about the show he was working on when he damn well knew he wasn’t supposed to do that. He reached a legal settlement.
This sounds like sour grapes.
He also sent sexually explicit and suggestive messages to a bunch of coworkers, fostering an uncomfortable work environment. He’s just an attention whore.
So this is addressed in the article and is a major part of the point. I don’t know if I believe what he has to say on the topic, but I think it’s worth reading, especially since it is easier for a major company to write a narrative than it is for a single creator to disprove one
Oh, geez. I didn’t read that far down the article. Yikes
I’ve know Sources and Alleged Sources a long time, if they say that’s what happened then I see absolutely no reason to doubt them. Why would Sources and Alleged Sources stick their necks out and lie, what would they gain?