irelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agolooks good to melemm.eeimagemessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down10cross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
arrow-up15arrow-down1imagelooks good to melemm.eeirelephant [he/him]🍭@lemm.ee to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square15fedilinkcross-posted to: programmer_humor@programming.dev
minus-squareintensely_human@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 months agoSo catching errors and doing nothing? That exists in every language except maybe BASIC?
minus-squareℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·3 months agoCatching individual errors is fine. Having all errors be ignored by default is weird.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarelocuester@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoVery different. This means default ignore all errors and continue to the next line. You’d have to explicitly catch every line in most(all?) other languages.
So catching errors and doing nothing? That exists in every language except maybe BASIC?
Catching individual errors is fine. Having all errors be ignored by default is weird.
deleted by creator
Very different. This means default ignore all errors and continue to the next line. You’d have to explicitly catch every line in most(all?) other languages.