• GreenMario@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah then MacOS 11 came out after 20 years. The idea was to have the same version number for the dumb dumbs. It’s why the Xbox 2 was called Xbox 360 so it’d match PlayStation 3, but bigger.

      • far_university1990@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox did the same bullshit. Was on version 5 for ages, saw chrome do insane version numbers, „oh no they might think we are outdated“. Now firefox v110.

        What a pile of shit

        • seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          LOL why do you care what version number it is? They could switch to using letters, I wouldn’t give a shit.

          The part that’s cool is rolling updates. It just doesn’t make sense to have a release schedule like they did. The reason why software had that in the first place was for marketing: you’re supposed to get excited for the new version 6.0 or whatever and run down to the computer store and buy it to replace your old, outdated version 5.0. That model doesn’t make sense for software that’s free, though. Incremental updates make more sense. Features get rolled out gradually instead of being all bundled together for a big, splashy upgrade.

    • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      the surprising thing there isn’t that they went back on their word, but that they said it in the first place.

      Seriously, how could an OS company seriously believe they’d never need or want to release a new major version

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It was to keep everyone in their eco system and just update it as they found more ways to extract revenue

        • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Right but they could have done that without promising that 10 would be the last Windows version. Let’s be honest, everyone is already locked into their ecosystem outside of enthusiasts and people with Apple Hardware. If you want a non-mac laptop/desktop, unless you go well out of your way, you’re almost certain to end up with a Windows PC, they didn’t need the “last version” gimmick to keep people on Windows.

          Hell, a lot of non-techy people who are already used to using Windows would rather not use a computer than learn to use a new OS. It’s easy to forget how tech illiterate the average person is

          • idiomaddict@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’m probably one of the less technically literate people here and in my case, you’re absolutely right. I assume Linux involves typing commands somewhere and I, frankly, have to look up how to do a vlookup in excel every time it happens.

            I would probably prefer to use my phone (an old ass iPhone) instead of a computer with a totally new os. I’m not a huge fan of macs, but it’s still basically the same on the user end. I suspect linux is more different.

            Inb4: I straight up don’t have time to switch my os for at least a year, I just wanted to support the above comment. I am well aware that my assumptions are probably wrong, just wanted to share what the reputation of Linux is among non tech people (if they’ve ever even heard of it).