• malaph@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Has there actually been a better century in terms of comfort and stability for most people

      • yata@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think I get your argument. Poor countries are much more prone to war, unrest, famines and all sorts of things contrary to “comfort and stability”.

      • malaph@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Take China for example. A middle class person in China today lives like an upper class person compared to the 1700s. A poor person on average anywhere is doing way better than ever before…

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes spending most of the day in a factory or a mine and rarely seeing sunlight is definitively like living as a blacksmith 300 years ago (I said blacksmith because it’s under upper class and I assume by middle class you mean office worker not middle income)

          Being a farmer is much easier as well now because machines make the work 100x easier and you only have to do 1000x the amount.

          Africa has certainly never had stability and the Inca/Mayans/Aztecs certainly had it worse than the rural folk of Central and South America

          Remember all those old paintings of kids going through garbage to find things to sell? That’s certainly not a modern phenomenon

          What about the people in winter climates that for a large portion couldn’t work in the winter? Yes they still did stuff but it wasn’t 40 hour weeks