"Tesla secured a series of approvals from California required for a promised robotaxi service.

The California Public Utilities Commission said it approved Tesla’s application for a transportation charter-party carrier permit, a license typically associated with chauffeur-operated services, allowing the company to own and control a fleet of vehicles and transport employees on pre-arranged trips.

The permit is a prerequisite for applying to operate an autonomous ride-hailing service in California, but a CPUC spokesperson said the current permit “does not authorize them to provide rides” in autonomous vehicles, and does not allow Tesla to operate a ride-hailing service to the public."

  • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Can’t wait to see how TSLA stocks prices will react once people realize what an amazing target Musk’s own fleet will be for vandalism and public furor:D

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      not to mention all the Musky Bro-Hoes getting hurt because they trusted FSD when it most definitely was not self driving.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    I would not trust a robo-taxi that relies entirely on cameras. It really does need lidar/radar and other sensors to work well.

  • halyk.the.red@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    18 days ago

    Call for an uber, driverless tesla pulls up. Call a tow truck, don’t cancel the order. “Yeah hi, thanks for showing up. Yeah I dunno, it just pulled up here and it’s blocking my driveway.”

  • Botzo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    18 days ago

    The CPUC is corporate bought and paid for (e.g. NEM 3.0).

    Absolute waste of space except that they’re the only speed bump to so many things. So I guess we’ve got that going for us.