cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/42020156

Can Canada create a food labeling system similar to this?

It’s confusing trying to buy Canadian with all the variations of made in, assembled in, grown in, packaged in, etc. Can we copy the Australian food labeling system, perhaps replacing the kangeroo with a maple leaf? I find this much clearer.

  • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    idk about elsewhere but at least a portion of roads here (australia) are paid through vehicle registration which is why they wouldn’t be considered free, we don’t have pensions like elsewhere; we have super funds which i guess are more like 401ks - it’s your money, and most people would consider the public school system free education

    we also have free public transport in some places, and that’s explicitly labelled as free

    everyone is well aware taxes pay for it; there’s no need to label it as a paid service

    • huppakee@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      If they say free public transport while it’s payed for by taxes than I’d say you’re right about healthcare being free as well. Glad we have different words to describe things that are freely available vs available at no extra cost vs actually free (like that discarded chair by the side of the road). Still feels disrespectful to me to call healthcare and education free tbh.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        free doesn’t mean no or low value though… just like expensive doesn’t mean high value. services are valued by utility; not cost. i’m not sure i see the disrespectful angle

        similar thing with airport lounges: you pay in some way for lounge access, but get practically unlimited food and drink at no cost… id say that constitutes free: you pay no more or less based on your use or non-use

        • huppakee@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          Maybe I should expand my definition of free then. I know low cost is not the same as low value, but in my mind free is something that comes without giving anything in return. If something has high value, you’re not likely to give it away without getting something in return. So I think my opinion has to do with not appreciating something because you call it free, but I guess that’s just me.