• nonearther@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not about that actually, it’s discrimination.

      These people are still seeing ads, but not the ones which they need at their age

      • mateomaui@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I understand that, which brings up the second baffling point that someone went to facebook to search for insurance providers in the first place.

        • ink@r.nf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re baffled people went on one of the most used website in the world to search for something. bruh…

          • mateomaui@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, I am baffled that anyone, with Facebook’s reputation for ads, selling personal information, etc, would choose to search for insurance carriers there instead of any number of other options that aren’t that big a leap away from Facebook, bruh.

            • RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are so many people who literally think Facebook is the internet and every other website is just a really personalized facebook page.

              • mateomaui@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ll have to take your word for that. As I said to someone else, if she were on AOL I could totally see that, but it’s more of stretch for me to believe it with Facebook.

                • max@feddit.nl
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  While I find it equally stupid as you do, you mustn’t forget that the overwhelming majority of users on the internet aren’t techies like us.

                  • mateomaui@reddthat.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    If this was grandma on AOL I would probably agree, but this person is cogent enough to actually file a lawsuit because the place she went to search didn’t serve her the ads she wanted. Hard to believe she didn’t also know at the very least that Google or Bing are options. I wouldn’t expect her to know about DuckDuckGo for instance.

                    edit: and the “95%” part of that reply was what made it more doubtful than anything. If people didn’t make such ridiculous overreaching claims, they’d be more believable. The exaggerations aren’t necessary or valid.

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        As much as most don’t like Facebook, I honestly don’t see why Facebook is at fault here. They’ve got a platform where advertisers come on, say “I want to sell ads to people Ages X-Y , Gender A, in Geography I, J and K”, and they serve ads accordingly. What are they supposed to do? Tell the advertisers “No no no, you need to also pay for ads on these other demographics that you explicitly excluded”? The plaintiff should be suing advertisers, not Facebook, for intentionally not targeting them.