Lady Butterfly @lazysoci.al to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agoImpossiblesopuli.xyzimagemessage-square37linkfedilinkarrow-up1439arrow-down114
arrow-up1425arrow-down1imageImpossiblesopuli.xyzLady Butterfly @lazysoci.al to Memes@sopuli.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square37linkfedilink
minus-squarecorsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·1 year ago there was no year 0 Just because no one said it was there, doesn’t mean it wasn’t. It’s like vaccines and autism and other things RFK doesnt believe in. They still exist!
minus-squareblitzen@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year ago Dionysius did not use a year zero; the year preceding AD 1 was 1 BC. “The Oxford Companion to the Year” by Blackburn & Holford-Strevens There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
minus-squareMalfeasant@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoBC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…
Just because no one said it was there, doesn’t mean it wasn’t.
It’s like vaccines and autism and other things RFK doesnt believe in. They still exist!
There was not a year zero. This isn’t a conspiracy theory.
BC and AD are separate numbering schemes- so just because there is no year 0 defined doesn’t mean you can’t extrapolate - 0 AD is the same as 1 BC, and you’ll have -1 AD which is equivalent to 2 BC and so forth…