cm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 3 个月前AI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comexternal-linkmessage-square84linkfedilinkarrow-up1489arrow-down15
arrow-up1484arrow-down1external-linkAI Models from Google, OpenAI, Anthropic Solve 0% of ‘Hard’ Coding Problemsanalyticsindiamag.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Programming@programming.dev · 3 个月前message-square84linkfedilink
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·3 个月前 Well, this kind of AI won’t ever be useful as a programmer It already is.
minus-squarechildOfMagenta@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up7·3 个月前You mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·3 个月前Ah - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 个月前I explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
minus-squareatzanteol@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·3 个月前 It’s great as autocomplete. I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
minus-squarewetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 个月前Did you even read my earlier comment?
It already is.
You mean useful to a programmer, or as useful as a programmer?
Ah - yeah I read that wrong. It’s useful to a programmer.
I explicitly meant “as”. It’s great as autocomplete. Not as an agent to complete programming tasks.
Thanks for clarifying.
I love the weird need to downplay just how good AIs are by calling them “autocomplete”.
Did you even read my earlier comment?