• Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    If that is so, that’s really cool.

    But other users said it already and I agree: Not everythibg needs to be smart.
    Really had attentiom issues with this whole infotainment system while driving.
    So I’d agree: Less is better. More knobs amd keys instead of a large pane of touchscreen. Also the whole infosec about cars is probably still only surface level. Who knows what outdated piece of tech lingers in the depths.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ah yes, such overly smart features as… your navigation on the screen, your currently playing music app, and maybe a handful of driving specific apps.

      It’s literally just the same stuff you would normally expect, but with the ability to install/change/update completely independently of the car.

      Also not sure what the age of the parts of the car have to do with anything. Are you concerned your 20 year old tv is suddenly going to be sprouting an autonomous cellular connection and broadcasting your content to the internet?

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          If the options are a phone in your hand, or a car safe version of the same info on your dash, I think it should be obvious which one is better.