I know they’ve been around since the GDPR came into effect, but I’ve suddenly noticed a sharp increase in the cookie prompts on web pages which have a second “legitimate interest” page. Some of these have an “object all” button, but plenty require you to manually opt-out of sometimes hundreds of ad-trackers.

The cynic in me assumes this is a legal loophole, whereby they can claim legitimate interest in your data in order to do exactly what they were going to do anyway (which is not what the legitimate interest feature of the GDPR is for) without being required to give you a “reject all” button.

  1. Am I being overly paranoid or is this exactly what’s happening?
  2. Does blocking all third-party cookies (something your browser should be able to do by default) negate all this need to reject anyway?
  3. If not then what’s the solution?

If you do have an answer then please state if it applies to EU/UK or other, non-GDPR-respecting countries!

  • dotslashme@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Personally I don’t trust cookie policies at all, I use plugins that will bypass cookie banners and then auto delete cookies 20 seconds later.

  • Devjavu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, I still disable them. The theory behind them is, that they actually serve a purpose for the function of the site, whereas cookies in general can be used for a variety of actions. Like tracking. Realistically, the site will work just fine without.

  • Albin Jose@kerala.party
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cookies are less harmful when comparing to other tracking like canvas fingerprint or thirdparty scripts tracking.

    • splendoruranium@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Legitimate interest is their interest, not yours.

      The interest might be theirs but the “legitimate” part absolutely has to incorporate a written justification somewhere within the the depths of the mandated records of processing activities that explains why the business/institution couldn’t possibly do what they’re doing without processing that particular piece of user data. “I want that” is not legitimate interest in the sense of Article 6.

      • shadycomposer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agree. But practically they may claim using such data to improve their systems. This is a valid LI justification. But still it provides no benefits to users to whom those data are collected from, while at the same time increases their risks (such as mishandling of their data - which is common since it’s very difficult to handle data 100% correctly).

  • TheInsane42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    For me there is no legitimate interest from sites. When they ask to track you, the answer is no for me. Required cookies that will break the site when you block them are bad enough, but can be useful for fora or sites where you order stuff.