When I was in elementary school, the cafeteria switched to disposable plastic trays because the paper ones hurt trees. Stupid, I know… but are today’s initiatives any better?

        • Bojimbo@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Most people simply arent going to go vegan, and many need to take baby steps toward it. Cutting out beef is a great first step.

          • NotAPenguin@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But let’s also not make it seem more difficult than it is, it’s very easy to avoid animal products.

            Shouting “BUT YOU DON’T HAVE TO DO IT ALL THE WAY” every time veganism is brought up is a bit silly.

    • JasSmith@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The average British person emits 76 times more CO2 than the offset of one person going vegan for life. Even if everyone on the planet went vegan today, forever, their sacrifice would be undone by the number of new babies born in a single year, globally. Veganism isn’t going to solve climate change. It’s not even going to make a dent. We should be focusing on practical, real measures to reduce global CO2 output. For example, the move from coal to LNG halves CO2 output. This transition alone is an order of magnitude more impactful than the entire world going vegan for life. If you care about climate change you’ll invest your limited time and energy where it counts.

        • JasSmith@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You can easily be vegan while advocating for other change like less coal.

          Sorry, but major lifestyle changes are not “easy.” It’s “easy” to lose weight, and yet two thirds of Americans can’t do it. I like eating meat but would be willing to give it up if the juice were worth the squeeze. It’s not. Instead of spending your time telling people to make major lifestyle changes with almost zero impact to the climate, why aren’t you focusing on real, sustainable solutions?

          FYI the top four metrics in the image you linked are for agriculture, not meat production alone. Agriculture includes the production of plants, fruits, and grains. It’s all food production.

            • JasSmith@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I find it very difficult. It appears that what you find easy and what others find easy are not the same.

              • NotAPenguin@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                What’s hard about choosing the plant based option in the grocery store or restaurant?
                It’s literally just buying a different product.

                • JasSmith@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I like meat a lot. Not eating meat will significantly degrade my standard of living.

                  • NotAPenguin@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    You’d be surprised how many vegans said that exact same thing… and then went vegan.

                    I used to eat meat too and know it’s tasty but you’re probably not as addicted to it as you think.

                    Plant based food can be just as tasty and knowing your food isn’t harming animals or the planet is great.

                    Are your tastebuds really more important than the lives of other animals and the health of our planet?

    • nivenkos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or drive electric, and minimise your meat consumption - this is much more feasible.

      I don’t drive and live in one of the cities with the best public transportation in the world, but am still looking to get a car because public transport is still terrible. E.g. if you need to pick up or return something, or to take one of my friends to work who works outside the city and at night.

      A car is required to live freely, otherwise you’re just trapped in cities.

      • Jnxl@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        What we need is easily accessible rental cars for when we really need them. Private cars and jets should never have been a thing…

        • Crisps@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Much better is to eliminate the need for a car. Good public transport would make a massive difference.

          If you had 100% rentals, the amount of cars on the road stays the same because everyone needs the at the same rush hours.

          We should be incentivizing work from home. E.g. require an extra 1 hour of pay per for any employee that needs to be on site. We’d soon see how essential offices are.

        • nivenkos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe with self-driving cars it’ll be more doable as the cars can drive themselves to-and-from their hubs and charging point, etc.

          But we’re still a while away from that being widely achievable.

          In Europe the roads and parking are nightmare in most places, so I’m not really a huge fan of it, but it’s really the only option for freedom for the foreseeable future.

          Sadly the likeliest outcome will just be governments continuing to make it more and more expensive to get a licence, own and insure a car, drive in cities or on motorways, etc. until it becomes the reserve of the wealthy again, just like they’re steadily doing with air fares too (increasing air fuel duty whilst exempting private jets). So the rich can drive their SUVs and private jets whilst the working class are trapped in overcrowded cities, in their tiny pod apartments eating bugs all in the name of the environment.